Talk:Lt. Surge's Raichu: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 15 October 2010 by Ruberduck0123 in topic Male?
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
Werdnae (talk | contribs)
Line 23: Line 23:
Would Raichu be male due to its tail? (female Raichu don't have a sharp end on their tail)  [[User:Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#DAA520 ;">'''Ruber'''</span>]][[User talk:Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#999999 ;">'''duck'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#4FD9FF ;">'''0123'''</span>]] 07:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Would Raichu be male due to its tail? (female Raichu don't have a sharp end on their tail)  [[User:Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#DAA520 ;">'''Ruber'''</span>]][[User talk:Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#999999 ;">'''duck'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#4FD9FF ;">'''0123'''</span>]] 07:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
:Gender differences weren't introduced until Gen IV. They can't be used for determining the gender of Pokémon introduced before then in the anime unless they have the appearance which wasn't the case for prior generations, and/or they have changed (evolved or were introduced) after DP001. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 07:35, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
:Gender differences weren't introduced until Gen IV. They can't be used for determining the gender of Pokémon introduced before then in the anime unless they have the appearance which wasn't the case for prior generations, and/or they have changed (evolved or were introduced) after DP001. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 07:35, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
:: Oh, OK  [[User:Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#DAA520 ;">'''Ruber'''</span>]][[User talk:Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#999999 ;">'''duck'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Ruberduck0123|<span style="color:#4FD9FF ;">'''0123'''</span>]] 07:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:38, 15 October 2010

Unknown # of Episodes as Pikachu

How do we know that Raichu spent episodes as a Pikachu? After all, it was only the 14th episode! How do we know it wasn't a Pikachu before Ash became a trainer, thus, before the series started?--KukiTalk 23:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

It would still be a certain amount of episodes. If it was... 24 episodes it was a Pikachu, then it would've began being a Pikachu or whatever in episode -10 or something. But in my opinion, I think it would be less than one episode, because Brock thought Lt. Surge evolved Pikachu into a Raichu right after he got it, and that proved to be partly true. So yeah. -- SpontaneousCombusken 23:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Team in the games

Ignore my previous comment, I was on the wrong page. --- Gastly's mama

Image

I found this image on the web a long time ago, and noticing that this article has the "Unsatisfactory image" tag, I thought it could be used instead. The thing is that I can't see what's wrong with the current image, so I won't change it since I don't know if my image is better or doesn't have the unspecified mistake.

File:RaichuandSurge.png
Proposed image

Bite?

Didn't his Raichu use Bite against Ash's Pikachu? --Kimori Geckarbor Hinoarashi 22:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Kimori Geckarbor Hinoarashi Kimori-Hinoarashi

Male?

Would Raichu be male due to its tail? (female Raichu don't have a sharp end on their tail) Ruberduck0123 07:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Gender differences weren't introduced until Gen IV. They can't be used for determining the gender of Pokémon introduced before then in the anime unless they have the appearance which wasn't the case for prior generations, and/or they have changed (evolved or were introduced) after DP001. Werdnae (talk) 07:35, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oh, OK Ruberduck0123 07:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply