User talk:Kenji-girl/Archive 16: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 16 January 2011 by Rockersk08 in topic Ash's Pikachu
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
Jolami (talk | contribs)
Rockersk08 (talk | contribs)
m Ash's Pikachu: New section
Line 79: Line 79:
::::I'm not sure if you saw, but I changed the text to "some of these". Again, there is no evidence that Ash gave away Primeape. It's not like Butterfree, Lapras, Pigeot, and Beedrill. Did James release Cacnea when he gave it to Gardenia for training? Nope. Will we see it again? Probably not but we can't be sure. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 00:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
::::I'm not sure if you saw, but I changed the text to "some of these". Again, there is no evidence that Ash gave away Primeape. It's not like Butterfree, Lapras, Pigeot, and Beedrill. Did James release Cacnea when he gave it to Gardenia for training? Nope. Will we see it again? Probably not but we can't be sure. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 00:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
:::I come to see, it's better! Yes i agree there is no evidence that Ash gave away Primeape but there is also no evidence that he still owns it, in resulting we are confronted with a question mark is why I suggested you to specify ot. 00:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
:::I come to see, it's better! Yes i agree there is no evidence that Ash gave away Primeape but there is also no evidence that he still owns it, in resulting we are confronted with a question mark is why I suggested you to specify ot. 00:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
==Ash's Pikachu==
I've been dealing with two users that are bringing up the point about Ash's Pikachu and the Poké Ball it should have been in. The argument is that Pikachu was put into a standard Poké Ball instead of the lighting bolt marked one. I need extra staff input in resolving this issue. Can you weigh in?
Also, can you check the IP on [[User talk:Clark|this user]]? I think it might be related to the two users above. Thanks! --[[User:Rockersk08|<font color="red">rock</font>]][[User talk:Rockersk08|<font color="blue">ersk</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Rockersk08|<font color="green">08</font>]] 03:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:12, 16 January 2011

Kenji-girl's Talkpage Archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Current Talk

Notability Question

I found a mini movie on the Internet called Pokémon Apokélypse. Can I make an article about it? Pokedex493 04:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Already answered on your talk page Ataro 04:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A Stat Trainers Navigation

Hi, Kenji-girl, I'm KayKay. I do a lot of work on templates and navigations. I was just wondering if I could get an administrator approve this template and this Guide to making a navigation for your userpage? Thanks.--KayKay|Chat to me! 12:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't really like that navigation. The sprites seem unnecessary. And I would have no idea where to put your guide on Bulbapedia. You can ask someone like MAGNEDETH, but I think it belongs in your userspace. --ケンジガール 12:18, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Team Rocket Grunt (Trainer class)

Can you delete Team Rocket Grunt (Trainer class) and its associated talk page so that the actual article Team Rocket Grunt can be moved to Team Rocket Grunt (Trainer class)? --Landfish7 12:21, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! --Landfish7 12:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ash's Tepig

Can you set this page to autoconfirmed? A new user keeps removing correct trivia. --HoennMaster 04:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Userspace

How do I add a page to my Userspace? I wish to make a Usertag. Gliscorguy54 22:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Type your user name in to the search bar then the name of you page , e.g. User:05308/The name of my page, it will telll you the article dose not exsisted and ask you if u want to create it Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 22:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey

Hey KG, can you come on AIM? Have to ask something. Thanks ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 09:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yeah. I was asleep when you posted this. Are you on now? --ケンジガール 19:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
No prob. I'm on now, you there? ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 02:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. I'll be on in a second. --ケンジガール 02:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
In case you didn't know, my username there is FlyingPochama948, not Kenji-girl. Still waiting. --ケンジガール 02:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oopsy... Didn't know that, on my way Mam!. ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 02:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry

I'm sorry Mrs. Kenji-girl for making two pages that where in your main space, I didn't see them, I'm so sorry. --Bye 13:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I user spaced them because the titles are tentative, meaning that they can change. If you here anything new, let me know first. --ケンジガール 21:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Movie synopsi

How badly do we want those improved? R.A. Hunter Blade 19:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Anyone is free to improve them. I am guessing they are too long? --ケンジガール 21:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Actually, nevermind. I hadn't ever received e-mails that somebody had edited them, even though it was a few months ago it happened. They've been on my to-do list for forever, but since I haven't been here much, I haven't gotten around to it. Thanks though. R.A. Hunter Blade 21:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry....

I was trying to ask about possible trivia for the Ice Ball page but kind of forget to check the move's description. In the game's it's the user rolling into a ball of ice but in the anime it's a ball of ice thrown at the opponent created by the user. Since I thought I was wrong I just deleted the trivia part and asked for it to be deleted. Sorry for messing around there.... Shiramu Kuromu 21:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

To the progect Anime leader

If we could have your final word here, so that it is flat out decided, that would be much appreciated Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 20:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Squirtle's gender

There is a bit of a Dispute on the Ash's Squirtle page regarding its gender. In the Japanese version of EP017, the Pokémon Subtitles for Squirtle use the personal pronoun "ore" (おれ), a masculine pronoun, which some have taken as "confirming" its gender as male. Ore is not used exclusively by males, as many websites will protest, and often female characters in anime often use the pronoun to denote masculinity. I have been trying to keep the page gender-neutral but I have been led here to ask you for the final say. --Jda95 06:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yeah... I had doubts on that myself. I believe I mentioned there that Anabel uses "boku" in the original version, a male pronoun. Go ahead and remove the gender. --ケンジガール 06:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

New template

Since you're the one that oversees all things anime, I thought you should be one of the first to see the new Template I came up with. :) Jo the Marten ಠ_ಠ 07:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm guessing this is for the episode pages. I don't know how I feel about it. I mean, it's pretty and all. I just think it would be too much of a hassle when episodes need to be updated. Like when an episode airs. Sometimes I watch and write down the characters I see in the episode as it airs. It would be difficult if I had to deal with all of the coding while trying to remember what I just saw. And I'm sure that applies to other users. Not to mention it might be confusing for inexperienced users.
If it were to be used, I would suggest that it would be in list form, like on the pages, and that the text would be left aligned, instead of centered. It would be easier to read that way. But I'm just not that thrilled about the idea of using a template. --ケンジガール 07:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Question

Hi. I would want to ask you about Ash's and Dawn's article: I think we have better to modify the part "In training" into "Can be called upon" for Ash, and for Dawn "Released" instead "in training" (about "Dawn's Ambipom"). "In training" is a statement too vague to express their real status, Because that either those of the laboratory of Professor Oak or those released are in training, all pokémons when they have the occasion to train, they do it, it's logic. For exemple, ash's Quilava: it learned a new move in the laboratory of Professor Oak meaning that it trains there. About Ambipom, she is right in training but this one is in training to improve her capabilities for a sport she enjoys. That doesn't interest us. What interests us is knowing what a character did of the pokémon, in this case, Dawn released her. And the same situation is to be considered for Ash's Primeape whose i suggest to put it in the part "Released". What do you think ? Falk 20:58, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think it's fine the way it is. I mean, there's no proof that they won't be called upon ever again, even though it's incredibly unlikely. I think Ash's Gliscor taught us that. I thought it was gone for good but... oh surprise, Ash calls it back for the Sinnoh League. Ash's Gliscor and Dawn's Ambipom are in the same category in my eyes. If Gliscor can return, why can't Ambipom or Primeape? It's very unpredictable. --ケンジガール 21:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I agree whith what you said but why not adding a part for Pokemon that can be called upon (Ash's Charizard and Ash's Squirtle) ? Jolami 21:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Technically, they are in training.
Oh BTW, Jolami, I checked your IP address and it is the same as Falk's. Care to explain that? --ケンジガール 22:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes of course, the user Falk is my older sister, therefore we're using the same IP. Ok about they're technically in training but it brings confusion with pokemon that can be called upon and the other that can't (not still today in the anime). Jolami 22:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's realy nice like that but concerning Primeape, yes maybe, it can be called upon in the futur, however it wasn't hapenned today in the anime, don't you think that we have to precise (putting him in the part released as it precised in its article and same thing for Ambipom or precising that Ash's Charizard and Squirtle can called be upon apart Primeape)? Thanks for your antention Jolami 00:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

But we don't know they are officially released. As I said before, what if I were to move Primeape/Ambipom to released and an episode in the future shows the Trainer call them back to their team? They could end up just like Gliscor. --ケンジガール 00:14, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
All right, you convinced me, thanks one more time for your explication! Jolami 00:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
But juste about the section where there is Primeape, you affirm that he still owns it and can be called upon: Ash still owns Ash's Charizard and Squirtle for sure but we don't know about Primeape, maybe we have to precise that or saying about Pokemon that can be called upon and still owns by Ash are Ash's Charizard and Squirtle, don't you think ? Jolami 00:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure if you saw, but I changed the text to "some of these". Again, there is no evidence that Ash gave away Primeape. It's not like Butterfree, Lapras, Pigeot, and Beedrill. Did James release Cacnea when he gave it to Gardenia for training? Nope. Will we see it again? Probably not but we can't be sure. --ケンジガール 00:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I come to see, it's better! Yes i agree there is no evidence that Ash gave away Primeape but there is also no evidence that he still owns it, in resulting we are confronted with a question mark is why I suggested you to specify ot. 00:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Ash's Pikachu

I've been dealing with two users that are bringing up the point about Ash's Pikachu and the Poké Ball it should have been in. The argument is that Pikachu was put into a standard Poké Ball instead of the lighting bolt marked one. I need extra staff input in resolving this issue. Can you weigh in?

Also, can you check the IP on this user? I think it might be related to the two users above. Thanks! --rockersk08 03:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply