Talk:Dry Skin (Ability): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 28 April 2011 by Xel in topic Is damage increase really 25% ?
mNo edit summary |
→Is damage increase really 25% ?: new section |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Do we really have to say "which are dual-typed"? Seriously, it doen't relate to the purpose of the article n the slightest bit, and should be removed. --[[User:Gen1king|<span style="color:gold">''GEN''</span>]]1[[User talk:Gen1king|<span style="color:gold">KING</span>]] 06:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | Do we really have to say "which are dual-typed"? Seriously, it doen't relate to the purpose of the article n the slightest bit, and should be removed. --[[User:Gen1king|<span style="color:gold">''GEN''</span>]]1[[User talk:Gen1king|<span style="color:gold">KING</span>]] 06:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:We do that for many abilities. [[User:Turtwig A|Turt]][[wig]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|A]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|contribs]]) 16:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | :We do that for many abilities. [[User:Turtwig A|Turt]][[wig]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|A]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|contribs]]) 16:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Is damage increase really 25% ? == | |||
I read on several forums, like Smogon, that it added a weakness to Fire, rendering Paras the only Pokémon to ever take 8x more damage from a certain type. Shouldn't the damage increase be 100% and not 25% ? [[User:Xel|Xel]] 01:55, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:55, 28 April 2011
Does Water Sport have any extra effect? Kanjo 15:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't, I checked Kanjo 15:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem like a good ability to me, it loses HP just because? --☯ *Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* ☯ 21:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- This is for the forums. And it also heals during another climate. It's Turtwig A! My talk or wiki edits 21:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem like a good ability to me, it loses HP just because? --☯ *Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* ☯ 21:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Is this really necessary?
"Four Pokémon have this ability, all of which are dual-typed."
Do we really have to say "which are dual-typed"? Seriously, it doen't relate to the purpose of the article n the slightest bit, and should be removed. --GEN1KING 06:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Is damage increase really 25% ?
I read on several forums, like Smogon, that it added a weakness to Fire, rendering Paras the only Pokémon to ever take 8x more damage from a certain type. Shouldn't the damage increase be 100% and not 25% ? Xel 01:55, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
