Talk:April Fool's Day 2005/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:05, 5 April 2005

A unique report that is informative and well illustrated. - 振霖_T 17:39, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I agree with the previous comment. In addition, it may be wise to have another candidate ready, as this article will only be relevant for a few weeks at the most. - Argy 01:07, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The article seems to have very limited relevance now that the day had passed, and is in all honesty little more than a list of events, with little depth. Hardly the kind of material we'd want for our first feature. - User:Archaic

A reminder: the featured article of the day is different from a featured article - an article will always have featured article status, and a featured article of the day is necessarily a featured article; however, a featured article does not necessarily have to ever be, or have been a featured article of the day. - 振霖_T 16:05, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:35, 5 April 2005 view source Jshadias (talk \| contribs) 1,945 edits m →Object (1) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:05, 5 April 2005 view source Zhen Lin (talk \| contribs) Leadership Board, Technical staff 8,449 edits m →Other comments Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	===Other comments===		===Other comments===
			* A reminder: the featured article of the day is different from a featured article - an article will always have featured article status, and a featured article of the day is necessarily a featured article; however, a featured article does not necessarily have to ever be, or have been a featured article of the day. - [[User:Zhen Lin\|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin\|T]]</sub> 16:05, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)