Talk:April Fool's Day 2005/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:59, 14 April 2005

A unique report that is informative and well illustrated. - 振霖_T 17:39, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The article seems to have very limited relevance now that the day had passed, and is in all honesty little more than a list of events, with little depth. Hardly the kind of material we'd want for our first feature. - User:Archaic

Agreed. The first impression that people get from coming to Bulbapedia could very well be the featured article, being the cream of the crop, if this is a page of jokes... Then well I don't think it's a good advertisement if anything else. And while it is informative, it has little content at all, being nothing more of a basic list and a couple of screenshots. Little effort has been put into the article. - Ferret

A reminder: the featured article of the day is different from a featured article - an article will always have featured article status, and a featured article of the day is necessarily a featured article; however, a featured article does not necessarily have to ever be, or have been a featured article of the day. - 振霖_T 16:05, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-===Support (2)===
+===Support (1)===
 * A unique report that is informative and well illustrated. - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 17:39, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
-* I agree with the previous comment. In addition, it may be wise to have another candidate ready, as this article will only be relevant for a few weeks at the most. - [[User:Argy|Argy]] 01:07, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 ===Object (2)===