Talk:Agatha's Gengar: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 30 September 2013 by GamerGeek
I didn't notice this until now. |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::As for me, I think the article is very good. It might be the next one I bring up in the forum discussion thread to bring more publicity to it. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC) | ::As for me, I think the article is very good. It might be the next one I bring up in the forum discussion thread to bring more publicity to it. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::Kenji-girl already deemed Agatha's Gengar as unnotable for its own article before. It was also mentioned in the history section as well (even got protected for edit warring). [[User:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Patty</span>]][[User talk:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Man</span>]] 17:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | :::Kenji-girl already deemed Agatha's Gengar as unnotable for its own article before. It was also mentioned in the history section as well (even got protected for edit warring). [[User:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Patty</span>]][[User talk:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Man</span>]] 17:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::She was only referring to its ''anime'' notability (as she's the head of that project); this article is obviously more focused on its role in the Adventures manga, in which it had a much larger role. [[Special:Contributions/GamerGeek|<span style="color:aqua">☆</span>]][[User:GamerGeek|<span style="color:teal">Gamer</span>]][[User talk:GamerGeek|<span style="color:gold">Geek</span>]][[Steelix (Pokémon)|<span style="color:orange">☆</span>]] 02:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:04, 30 September 2013
This article's been sitting in the userspace for a while now, but I think it looks good enough to be mainspaced...anyone else have other thoughts? ☆GamerGeek☆ 22:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- No. --The Truth aka Relicant 22:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Try to explain yourself next time! =p
- As for me, I think the article is very good. It might be the next one I bring up in the forum discussion thread to bring more publicity to it. MaverickNate 22:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Kenji-girl already deemed Agatha's Gengar as unnotable for its own article before. It was also mentioned in the history section as well (even got protected for edit warring). PattyMan 17:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- She was only referring to its anime notability (as she's the head of that project); this article is obviously more focused on its role in the Adventures manga, in which it had a much larger role. ☆GamerGeek☆ 02:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Kenji-girl already deemed Agatha's Gengar as unnotable for its own article before. It was also mentioned in the history section as well (even got protected for edit warring). PattyMan 17:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
