User talk:SilverZoroark

Welcome to Bulbapedia, SilverZoroark!

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules: Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct. Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around. Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page. Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style. You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy. Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page. If you have a question about something, be proactive. Take a look at our FAQ. If you're still stuck, ask for help. The staff won't bite. Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment. For more handy links, see the welcome portal.

Thank you, and have a good time editing here!   TheShinyRoggenrola (talk) 17:33, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please understand that edit warring (reverting another user's revision of you, especially multiple times) is not acceptable. Instead of repeatedly reverting other users, you should discuss it on a user's talk page or on (in this case) Yveltal's talk page. Thank you. Tiddlywinks (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Response By SilverZoroark to Tiddlywinks - Re: Edit warring

Ah, I see Tiddlywinks. . . I see the little game you're playing with me. Same as always. You Bulbapedia admins make me sick. So, by based on your flawed logic, it is okay for you to undo my revision multiple times without discussing it with me??? No, I will NOT "discuss" it on the talk page. I've done that before. . . It doesn't make one bit of a difference. I know how this place works, which is why I HATE editing here. This place is a joke, and you people are cruel, biased, opinionated, and self-centered. Only certain high-ranking members, like you, have total authority, and you guys just jump at the opportunity to revert edits that you disagree with, even if they make sense. Only your little elite high-ranking Bulba-group gets to decide what is "right or wrong" or "accurate" -- but only according to your slanted opinions. Your opinions mean more than anyone else's, and you treat newbies like scum, even though we try out best to make helpful, sensible and accurate edits. No matter how much sense I make or what I say on the talk page, I know that you guys will not listen, and you will berate and brush me off. You will stick your biased opinions, and stick to your ridiculous ERRORS. Fine with me -- that's your problem. You are only making this site a hostile environment for anyone who tries to help, and driving new potential helpers away. In my opinion, the "Origin" sections are an absolute joke, and should be done away with entirely. Goodbye. Have fun with your errors! -- SilverZoroark (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)