Talk:BW014: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "== Characters == When was it confirmed that Aloe, Kidachi, and Aloe's Miruhog would appear in this episode? I know it was speculated but I don't recall it being confirmed?") |
(→Mama/mammy: new section) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
When was it confirmed that Aloe, Kidachi, and Aloe's Miruhog would appear in this episode? I know it was speculated but I don't recall it being confirmed? | When was it confirmed that Aloe, Kidachi, and Aloe's Miruhog would appear in this episode? I know it was speculated but I don't recall it being confirmed? | ||
{{unsigned|1rkhachatryan}} | |||
lol sorry I forgot to sign.[[User:1rkhachatryan|RBK]] 00:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Aloe was seen during a preview of clips from BW013 and BW014. But I guess they could of slipped in a clip from BW015 in there was well. Kidachi was confirmed by Newtype. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 01:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Ok thanks![[User:1rkhachatryan|RBK]] 01:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
In the preview of BW014 Dent gets possessed by a mask that looks like Desumasu's, do you think it's possible that the pokemon is behind the museum exhibits coming to life? ([[User:Azure42|Azure42]] 17:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)) | |||
:Yes I think so, because the mask that possesses Dent looks a lot like the one that can be seen on {{p|Desumasu}}. [[User:MetalMetroid997|MetalMetroid997]] 18:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
::It doesn't look like the mask, it '''IS''' the mask [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 18:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Its not a mask, its Desumasu's face from its previous life so technically, Desumasu makes its debut in this episode.[[Bulbapedia:Project Custom Sprite|<font color="brown"><small><sup>☆</sup></small></font>]][[User:Tavisource|<font color="teal">Tavis</font>]][[User talk:Tavisource|<font color="gray"><small>ource</small></font>]] 21:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Mama/mammy == | |||
I've trimmed down the trivia about Hawes using the word "Mama" having anything to do with the mammy archetype, leaving in only the bit about Lenora's apron. I've similarly moved the link to Wikipedia so it remains in the trivia as before. A husband calling his wife "mama" is a normal Japanese social convention, and has nothing to do with the mammy archetype. A wife will do the same thing in referring to her husband as "papa". Saying that the "mama" nickname has anything to do with the mammy archetype is erroneous. The real issue was the apron. [[User:Numelgon|Numelgon]] ([[User talk:Numelgon|talk]]) 18:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:17, 29 December 2019
Characters
When was it confirmed that Aloe, Kidachi, and Aloe's Miruhog would appear in this episode? I know it was speculated but I don't recall it being confirmed? - unsigned comment from 1rkhachatryan (talk • contribs)
lol sorry I forgot to sign.RBK 00:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Aloe was seen during a preview of clips from BW013 and BW014. But I guess they could of slipped in a clip from BW015 in there was well. Kidachi was confirmed by Newtype. --ケンジのガール 01:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Ok thanks!RBK 01:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
In the preview of BW014 Dent gets possessed by a mask that looks like Desumasu's, do you think it's possible that the pokemon is behind the museum exhibits coming to life? (Azure42 17:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC))
- Yes I think so, because the mask that possesses Dent looks a lot like the one that can be seen on Desumasu. MetalMetroid997 18:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Mama/mammy
I've trimmed down the trivia about Hawes using the word "Mama" having anything to do with the mammy archetype, leaving in only the bit about Lenora's apron. I've similarly moved the link to Wikipedia so it remains in the trivia as before. A husband calling his wife "mama" is a normal Japanese social convention, and has nothing to do with the mammy archetype. A wife will do the same thing in referring to her husband as "papa". Saying that the "mama" nickname has anything to do with the mammy archetype is erroneous. The real issue was the apron. Numelgon (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)