Talk:DP069: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 21 July 2008 by Shiningpikablu252 in topic English dud title?
LucarioWolf (talk | contribs) →English dud title?: new section |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
On Wikipedia Its listed as Giving a Galatic Big Hand! | On Wikipedia Its listed as Giving a Galatic Big Hand! | ||
:I say wait for Cartoon Network's schedule to show such a title. The title put onto Wikipedia could be 100% false and have been put on there by a complete idiot. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 17:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:33, 21 July 2008
Is it really confirmed?I cannot see it in the BulbaNews!-Billy4b2004 04:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Bulbanews just reports the news; it isn't a primary source. Plus, the article is already there now anyway. --FabuVinny T-C-S 05:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Toxicroak???
- Is Saturn stealing the spotlight of Team Galactic again??? (assuming that they use the very same Pokémon they used in the games, much like the Gym Leaders) Ej92 12:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yup, just as I thought, Saturn is stealing the spotlight for Team Galactic AGAIN. Ej92 03:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- It makes perfect sense to use the character that has been building up the organisation's presence for the first confrontation with Team Twerps. The other two admins will have their time in the spotlight - the Team Galactic plotline starts here. --FabuVinny T-C-S 12:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Croagunk
I think croagunk will evolve because it fights its evolved form and it gets all mad at it having some sort of staring contest with its evolution.
- no evo-glow, no jumpin to conclusions.
KPF30px 30px 06:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I believe it is a sign that croagunk will evolve, maybe some time in the future. Why else have a shiny toxicroak?
Toxicroak's Shinyness/True or not?
I have a pretty strong belief that Toxicroak isn't shiny and I'd like to see the alternate coloration info removed. Anyone agree? --Ricco 03:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well we're actually having an on-going conversation about this on talk:Toxicroak. --Theryguy512 03:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Besides, even if it's revealed that this Toxicroak is not of alternate-coloration (which I doubt, I'm 100% certain that this Toxicroak is of alternate-coloration, and if it's not, the dub probably will change the colors), I doubt all information about alternate coloration would be removed. After all, the Toxicroak's coloring is equal to the game's alternate-color coloring and quite a bit different from the game's normal coloring, and people would get confused if there was no mention of the Pokémon's odd coloring. --Shiningpikablu252 04:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
English dud title?
On Wikipedia Its listed as Giving a Galatic Big Hand!
- I say wait for Cartoon Network's schedule to show such a title. The title put onto Wikipedia could be 100% false and have been put on there by a complete idiot. --Shiningpikablu252 17:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
