Talk:Mew (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 3 June 2009 by The dark lord trombonator
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
Other comments: I'm not saying the article isn't good - to be honest, I haven't evaluated its FAness yet. But let's remember the point of featuring articles
ElectAbuzzzz (talk | contribs)
m Protected "Talk:Mew (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate": closed vote ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 10:04, 2 July 2009

Support (14)

Does that make it a good article?--Cassandra Teh Kkllnnator K 01:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Ja, it and Bulbasaur are on the same level, and I supported Bulbasaur, so...--Cassandra Teh Kkllnnator K 01:36, 25

December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose (0)

Other comments

OK, fanboys, stop right there. The reason an article gets featured is because it stands out from the rest. Just because it's Pokémon number XYZ to be created, doesn't mean it necessarily gets flaunted. If you cast your vote because you believe the Pokémon to be special, go back and take a look at what we are actually voting on—the article. — THE TROM23:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply