Talk:Nando's Roserade: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Well, Nando is a recurring character, and even some character-of-the-day's pokémon have articles, like [[Orville]] the Pidgey, so why don't do an article about Nando's Roselia? [[User:Netto-kun|Netto-kun]] 12:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC) | Well, Nando is a recurring character, and even some character-of-the-day's pokémon have articles, like [[Orville]] the Pidgey, so why don't do an article about Nando's Roselia? [[User:Netto-kun|Netto-kun]] 12:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Roselia's Gender == | |||
If it ever evoles into a [[Roserade (Pokemon) |Roserade]] and it has a long cape, will we be able to know its gender? P.S. If you can classify Buizel as a male you can classify any pokemon with a gender, unless they look the same in both genders or it came from another region... | |||
--[[User:Zooky|Zooky]] 08:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC) <br> | |||
:Your logic is flawed, why can't the animators apply selective Gender Diffferences; yes for this species, no for that one. And besides, what reference point can you use to prove the cape is long? [[User:The Dark Fiddler|The Dark Fiddler]] - [[User talk:The Dark Fiddler|10% Satisfaction Guaranteed!]] 12:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Trivia== | |||
I don't think Armaldo has any attack to do with sound.Anyone agree?-[[User:Billy4b2004|Billy4b2004]] 09:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
yep it seems to be a true [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 09:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Evolution Time == | |||
It says that it spent 45 and 126 episodes as a Roselia, but unless I'm missing something wouldn't it be between 45 and 172 episodes as a Roserade, since the maximum time spent is between Episode of evolution revealed - first time it evolved so DP176-D004=172 episodes, unless I'm missing something. [[User:StephenWalker97|StephenWalker97]] ([[User talk:StephenWalker97|talk]]) 20:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Looking through the history [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Nando%27s_Roserade&diff=1078530&oldid=1078529 the user who placed the time placement] had it right, [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Nando%27s_Roserade&diff=1079239&oldid=1079233 but was changed] later on. Have no idea why the latter user changed the count, since the count was correct before.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#025DA6">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#5A96C5">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EA1A3E">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#F16A81">ire</span>]] 01:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:18, 18 July 2014
Huh...? Uhh... why...? --☆ケンジガール 01:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, Nando is a recurring character, and even some character-of-the-day's pokémon have articles, like Orville the Pidgey, so why don't do an article about Nando's Roselia? Netto-kun 12:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Roselia's Gender
If it ever evoles into a Roserade and it has a long cape, will we be able to know its gender? P.S. If you can classify Buizel as a male you can classify any pokemon with a gender, unless they look the same in both genders or it came from another region...
--Zooky 08:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Your logic is flawed, why can't the animators apply selective Gender Diffferences; yes for this species, no for that one. And besides, what reference point can you use to prove the cape is long? The Dark Fiddler - 10% Satisfaction Guaranteed! 12:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Trivia
I don't think Armaldo has any attack to do with sound.Anyone agree?-Billy4b2004 09:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
yep it seems to be a true Ataro 09:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Evolution Time
It says that it spent 45 and 126 episodes as a Roselia, but unless I'm missing something wouldn't it be between 45 and 172 episodes as a Roserade, since the maximum time spent is between Episode of evolution revealed - first time it evolved so DP176-D004=172 episodes, unless I'm missing something. StephenWalker97 (talk) 20:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Looking through the history the user who placed the time placement had it right, but was changed later on. Have no idea why the latter user changed the count, since the count was correct before.--ForceFire 01:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
