Talk:Haircut brothers: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 1 February 2011 by S and T in topic Number Values
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
Fsilone90 (talk | contribs)
S and T (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:
:*"[Pokemon] looks delighted!" For the Younger Brother, +10 for Pokemon with happiness values 0-199 and +4 for those with values 200-249. For the Older Brother, +5 for Pokemon with happiness values 0-100 and +2 for those with 200-249 values.
:*"[Pokemon] looks delighted!" For the Younger Brother, +10 for Pokemon with happiness values 0-199 and +4 for those with values 200-249. For the Older Brother, +5 for Pokemon with happiness values 0-100 and +2 for those with 200-249 values.
:This is for GSC; I believe it also applies to HGSS. [http://www.psypokes.com/gsc/happiness.php]--[[User:Fsilone90|Fsilone90]] 23:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
:This is for GSC; I believe it also applies to HGSS. [http://www.psypokes.com/gsc/happiness.php]--[[User:Fsilone90|Fsilone90]] 23:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone know the value for beauty? [[User:S and T|S and T]] 02:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:51, 1 February 2011

Number Values

does anyone know the exact number values for friendship increased by getting a haircut? --Shadofrak 17:41, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • "[Pokemon] looks a little happier." For the both the Older and Younger Brothers, +1 for Pokemon of all happiness values.
  • "[Pokemon] looks happy!" For both the Older and Younger Brother, +3 for Pokemon with happiness values 0-199, and +1 for those with 200-249.
  • "[Pokemon] looks delighted!" For the Younger Brother, +10 for Pokemon with happiness values 0-199 and +4 for those with values 200-249. For the Older Brother, +5 for Pokemon with happiness values 0-100 and +2 for those with 200-249 values.
This is for GSC; I believe it also applies to HGSS. [1]--Fsilone90 23:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone know the value for beauty? S and T 02:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply