Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 12 October 2010 by Dennou Zenshi in topic Pikachu (Pokémon)
Gagaromamah (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*Per [[User:Turtwig A|Turtwig A]], [[User:Epicsnail|Epicsnail]] 17:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | *Per [[User:Turtwig A|Turtwig A]], [[User:Epicsnail|Epicsnail]] 17:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Yeah, no. Too disorganized. [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green color light">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 01:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | *Yeah, no. Too disorganized. [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green color light">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 01:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Is it better now?--[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#C11B17">でんのう</font>]] <font color="#347C2C">☢</font> [[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#151B8D">'''Z'''えんし</font>]] 09:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
Revision as of 09:57, 12 October 2010
Support (6)
- This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--Alex726contributions 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe Bulbasaur? 梅子❀✿ 02:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Bulbasaur was already nominated and did not get voted in as a FA. Even if Bulbasaur literally represents Bulbapedia, it's article is not as detailed as Pikachu's. I am not playing favorites. I'm just stating my opinion that Pikachu's article is better than Bulbasaur's.--Alex726contributions 02:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support. I'm not fan of Pikachu, but it is time to have a Pokémon as FA and Pikachu has the best article of them.--でんのう ☢ Zえんし 06:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- This is my first time voting, so I could be wrong, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --☯ *Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* ☯ 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) Ataro 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great trivia and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. Pokemaster97 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Altough I think the trivia section is a little messy. I'm for.-- Gagaromamah, Your Little Monster 06:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Object (3)
- The trivia section is way too disorganized. It's Turtwig A! My talk or wiki edits 02:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Per Turtwig A, Epicsnail 17:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, no. Too disorganized. CuboneKing 01:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Is it better now?--でんのう ☢ Zえんし 09:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
