Talk:Radio: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Abcboy moved page Talk:Pokémon Music Channel to Talk:Radio in the Pokémon world without leaving a redirect: EB approved merge) |
m (Abcboy moved page Talk:Lucky Channel to Talk:Radio in the Pokémon world without leaving a redirect: EB approved merge) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | ==No cheating methods== | ||
I don´t understand. There is an extensive coverage of [[Glitch]]es, of which quite some of them allow you to dupe things, like the [[Old man glitch]], but a simple 'cheat' is not allowed to be posted? I mean, you can possibly obtain similar results by exploiting these glitches, which is, considerably, cheating as well. But there is encyclopedic coverage about them here. So why not in this case? [[User:ForTheLichKing!|FTLK]], [[User Talk:ForTheLichKing!|Talk!]], 10:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Cheating involves using an external device, glitching does not. Cheating really has no boundaries in what it can do, glitching does. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 13:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Four digit match == | |||
I would assume that four digits matching results in an Exp. Share, but currently the article implies that you get nothing. (You have to take the numbers as "exactly", because you only get one prize at a time.) --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 08:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Technically, if the last four digits match, the last three digits match as well. | |||
:You don't "have" to take it as "exactly"; logically, you simply get (/want) the highest/strongest possible match. If I create a lottery with a dozen (ordered) numbers and only check for a perfect match or matches on the first five numbers, I'm not gonna tell people they can't get a prize if they matched 6-11 numbers. Since there's no explicit match for four digits, that just falls through to the three digit match. | |||
:Not that I don't essentially understand the concern. But I can't think of a way to reword it that I'd like. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 09:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:13, 9 May 2016
No cheating methods
I don´t understand. There is an extensive coverage of Glitches, of which quite some of them allow you to dupe things, like the Old man glitch, but a simple 'cheat' is not allowed to be posted? I mean, you can possibly obtain similar results by exploiting these glitches, which is, considerably, cheating as well. But there is encyclopedic coverage about them here. So why not in this case? FTLK, Talk!, 10:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Cheating involves using an external device, glitching does not. Cheating really has no boundaries in what it can do, glitching does. --SnorlaxMonster 13:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Four digit match
I would assume that four digits matching results in an Exp. Share, but currently the article implies that you get nothing. (You have to take the numbers as "exactly", because you only get one prize at a time.) --SnorlaxMonster 08:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Technically, if the last four digits match, the last three digits match as well.
- You don't "have" to take it as "exactly"; logically, you simply get (/want) the highest/strongest possible match. If I create a lottery with a dozen (ordered) numbers and only check for a perfect match or matches on the first five numbers, I'm not gonna tell people they can't get a prize if they matched 6-11 numbers. Since there's no explicit match for four digits, that just falls through to the three digit match.
- Not that I don't essentially understand the concern. But I can't think of a way to reword it that I'd like. Tiddlywinks (talk) 09:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
