Talk:Ash's Pikachu/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
====Support (7)====
====Support (8)====
*I'll go with it. Pikachu's page is at least as good as Ash and the Pikachu to English translations are especially convincing. Only objection is that the main article fizzles a bit towards the end. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 16:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
*I'll go with it. Pikachu's page is at least as good as Ash and the Pikachu to English translations are especially convincing. Only objection is that the main article fizzles a bit towards the end. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 16:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
*Hmm... I guess he's right. I certainly like this one better than most other FACs. The only improvements I could suggest are to cut down on trivia by incorporating them into the main article (perhaps we could create a "gender debate" section to help with this?). (EDIT: as of 7/25/08 at 8:00 AST, {{u|Aura-Knight}} has made the changes I suggested, so now I'm more fully behind this.) --[[User:Martonimos|<font color="#008000">Martonimos</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Martonimos|((<font color="#00FF00">Argh</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Martonimos|<font color="#50C878">Blargh</font>))]]</sub> 23:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
*Hmm... I guess he's right. I certainly like this one better than most other FACs. The only improvements I could suggest are to cut down on trivia by incorporating them into the main article (perhaps we could create a "gender debate" section to help with this?). (EDIT: as of 7/25/08 at 8:00 AST, {{u|Aura-Knight}} has made the changes I suggested, so now I'm more fully behind this.) --[[User:Martonimos|<font color="#008000">Martonimos</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Martonimos|((<font color="#00FF00">Argh</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Martonimos|<font color="#50C878">Blargh</font>))]]</sub> 23:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Line 9: Line 9:
*I'd like to add my support for it getting Featured Article status. It's well written, informative, and as [[User:Martonimos|<font color="#008000">Martonimos</font>]] pointed out, the section on Pikachu's "language" is a great addition. --[[User:Mikekearn|<font color="#0000FF">Mike</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mikekearn|<font color="#000088">Contrib</font>]] 08:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
*I'd like to add my support for it getting Featured Article status. It's well written, informative, and as [[User:Martonimos|<font color="#008000">Martonimos</font>]] pointed out, the section on Pikachu's "language" is a great addition. --[[User:Mikekearn|<font color="#0000FF">Mike</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mikekearn|<font color="#000088">Contrib</font>]] 08:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
*I support it, since it's obviously well researched and well thought out. The information is accurate and complete, if not, then errors are very few. Two thumbs up. --[[User:JirachiWishmaker0802|JirachiWishmaker0802]] 04:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
*I support it, since it's obviously well researched and well thought out. The information is accurate and complete, if not, then errors are very few. Two thumbs up. --[[User:JirachiWishmaker0802|JirachiWishmaker0802]] 04:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
*I will support it as it is the best Pokémon page, and those aren't put in as featured article candidates very often. Also, it has no errors or things needing improvement. It leaves nothing out [[User:Thegreat4|Thegreat4]] 01:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


====Object (3)====
====Object (3)====

Revision as of 01:21, 30 October 2008

Support (8)

  • I'll go with it. Pikachu's page is at least as good as Ash and the Pikachu to English translations are especially convincing. Only objection is that the main article fizzles a bit towards the end. Aura-Knight 16:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Hmm... I guess he's right. I certainly like this one better than most other FACs. The only improvements I could suggest are to cut down on trivia by incorporating them into the main article (perhaps we could create a "gender debate" section to help with this?). (EDIT: as of 7/25/08 at 8:00 AST, Aura-Knight has made the changes I suggested, so now I'm more fully behind this.) --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 23:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • I go with cause it's a good page and very well written in some ways--CoolPikachu! 04:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes, THis article features one of the main chracters of the show. Elbutler 11:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
  • I think Pikachu is worth of being a Featured article. §#!π¥£!Ψ@Ϛ#µ 03:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
  • This is one of the best articles written about an anime Pokémon. Deemack199725 09:19, 05 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes.Shadow1337 23:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I'd like to add my support for it getting Featured Article status. It's well written, informative, and as Martonimos pointed out, the section on Pikachu's "language" is a great addition. --Mike | Contrib 08:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I support it, since it's obviously well researched and well thought out. The information is accurate and complete, if not, then errors are very few. Two thumbs up. --JirachiWishmaker0802 04:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I will support it as it is the best Pokémon page, and those aren't put in as featured article candidates very often. Also, it has no errors or things needing improvement. It leaves nothing out Thegreat4 01:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Object (3)

  • I don't think this choice is very original and it isn't what I would say is one of the best, and I think that there are more note-worthy articles out there. MoldyOrange 23:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • I concur, its nomination is bunkDCM 13:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  • We can do better. Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links11:44 15 Aug 2008

Other comments

In response to your comment Moldy Orange, most of those other articles are already nominated. Pikachu is probably the best anime Pokémon page. Aura-Knight 13:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

A lot of people will ignore this because it's a main character page, but unlike Ash, I believe this one actually has merit. The "language" section especially shows a great deal of research, and not the level you'd expect from some fangirl. I just want to make clear that we're not necessarily supporting this because "i <3 pikachu", although some of us might, but because we think it's a well-thought out article. I mean, come on, guys; I hate the anime and everything associated with it. --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 18:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)