:::::::My opinion on the boxart: too small at the current time for our purposes. We'll get it up probably in a few weeks when it appears on websites and such in high-res format. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 00:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
:::::::My opinion on the boxart: too small at the current time for our purposes. We'll get it up probably in a few weeks when it appears on websites and such in high-res format. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 00:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
::::::::Agree with you there since the boxart is mixed in with the Magazine scan and it is better to wait for pictures that have no magazine scan in them. So this pretty much ends the discussion of the topic of when the should the boxart pictures should be posted on this page. No need to add anything to the discussion at this point -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] 03:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
::::::::Agree with you there since the boxart is mixed in with the Magazine scan and it is better to wait for pictures that have no magazine scan in them. So this pretty much ends the discussion of the topic of when the should the boxart pictures should be posted on this page. No need to add anything to the discussion at this point -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] 03:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
:Look on the official site! The boxart is now there! --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 10:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
:Look on the official site! The boxart is now there! [[Image:HGSS Logos and Boxart.jpg|thumb|HGSS Logos and Boxart from official site]] --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 10:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
== New Area ==
== New Area ==
Revision as of 10:20, 15 June 2009
Remember, talk pages are meant for discussing the article itself, not the content. To post all your wild theories and random questions about the content of the games, see this forum section.
By the way, everyone's paying attention LIKE A HAWK to any and all information concerning HGSS. Cool it. We will have stuff up and ready as soon as time allows.
Request denied. We've just moved over to a new setup so there's a glitch in the thumbnails. No game boxart has yet been released, all we have is the logo. TTEchidna04:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Couldn't we simply use the HeartGold and SoulSilver logos that are currently on the Japanese Nintendo website?
It's the official visual representation of the new games currently, so my opinion is that they are best used until other official images are revealed.
Latest comment: 8 May 20093 comments3 people in discussion
Why does it say "2 players simultaneous"? The others say "1-4 players simultaneous", is it a mistake or did Nintendo just changed the whole idea behind the gameplay?Mr. Charlie09:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm guessing that's coz nothing's confirmed, but its fairly obvious that the two-player connection will remain. While it's quite likely the likes of the Union Room will let more than two players connect at once, I'll let TTE make that call. — THE TROM — 09:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Unless we hear from Nintendo that this game is only possible to play with two people I really think it should at least read "1-2 players simultaneous." Multiplayer-only games exist, but it would be extremely unprecedented if this was one of them--Barakku17:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Gen V
Latest comment: 13 May 200916 comments14 people in discussion
But didn't the originals open Gen II? This could just be the front cover of the Gen V book. They can program in new Pokémon and not use them if they like. GywallTalk11:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
No Gywall, once again, it is you who is missing the point. Just as FireRed LeafGreen were the same generation, so will be HeartGold and MoonSilver.Max King17:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hah, Gywall got told. Isn't it obvious they are Gen 4? I really cant understand how people think they could be Gen 5? What has changed between them and Platinum? Nothing is what. Max King17:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm going to make one point here really clear right now. While I have absolutely no authority to do this, if you are wishing for the end of Pokémon, I see no reason why you should be here, and I'm going to have to ask whoever is wishing for the end to leave. Generation V, however, you can wish for all you like, but its not likely to appear until at least 2010, possibly even 2011.--Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales15:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I see even more proof that these are NOT going to be Gen V games (which you guys seem to have missed). What are the only times a new region has been introduced in the main series games? AT THE START OF A GENERATION. HG & SS are NOT introducing a new zone, they're returning to an old zone. Diachronos17:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, and remember that new generations have come out when a new GameBoy or Nintendo portable console is introduced. Wish will likely happen in 2011, because of the usual two year gap. I also wanted them to be gen. V, but that would've messed up the two year gap.--AOS04:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
They can't really be considered Generation V, since they don't introduce a new region, new Pokemon, and new player characters. Nintendo will have probably released the successor to the DS by the time Generation V starts. Besides, FireRed and LeafGreen were remakes of Red and Blue, but they were still considered Generation III because they were released on GBA and could communicate with Ruby and Sapphire. So, HeartGold and SoulSilver should still be considered Generation IV. Link 48615:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Leave off Gywall. He/She is missing a few brain cells.Laxafett 17:05, 10 May 2009(UTC)
I definitely don't consider this Generation V because while Generation III released the re-releases between the first two games and the additional game which in that case is Emerald, for Generation IV it is the same concept except that the re-releases were released last, kind of like doing it backwards and personally the whole Generation V rumor is false. -Tyler5384115:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Link for the french article
Latest comment: 8 May 20092 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 27 May 200912 comments10 people in discussion
Should we mix in the article about the Gold and Silver Remake rumor into this one. Its good to give an insight to what happened before the games release.--Clarky1311:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Actually, you never really know. They might include some Crystal elements in the G/S remakes, the most obvious of which (aside from gender choice which has since become standard) would probably be the Battle Tower. --Shiningpikablu25214:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Or another Battle Frontier, bringing the total to 3, reminding that 2 of them are in Gen IV. And the probability is that they include all the elements from Crystal in HG/SS, like they did include all the elements from Blue in FR/LG. Yellow doesn't count as it was the fourth Gen I game and it was a special version rather than a common version, even though it had improvements over Blue and introduced prototypes of game mechanics that would make their real final introduction in G/S. That's why they didn't remake it. Pokemon lover17:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
OK, maybe there aren't that much elements (if any) from Blue taken to FR/LG but the only reason I mentioned them was for the sake of comparison. Pokemon lover18:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well, with the exception of the cries (they're from R/G; Blue didn't change them), you're right, TTE. And as for Missingno. Master, of course they'll include much more from Crystal than that, IMO. =D Pokemon lover14:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I do hope they retain at least the Battle Tower, though i don't think a Battle Frontier will happen again as thats in Platinum already, which means if people want a Battle Frontier they will buy Platinum (so Nintendo can make more cash probably). They might do a Trainer Tower-esque thing like in FR/LG. I wonder if the Red Gyarados will be kept?User:494alex
The red Gyarados should return, as it was one of the major plot points. It was also mentioned in the opening TV thing in Diamond and Pearl, another indicator that it will probably return. --Galladeon06:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Version-exclusives between Japanese and English versions
Latest comment: 24 May 20094 comments4 people in discussion
I'm surprised no one thought on this yet, even though it's all speculation right now. But do you think they'll do the same as in G/S? I mean, for some odd reason, Nintendo of America switched Teddiursa and Ursaring to Gold while Phanpy and Donphan were switched to Silver. In the Japanese versions, it's the opposite. Pokemon lover20:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Most likely, they'll include the English Version-Exclusives as they did with the R/G ->R/B remakes. (FYI, They kept the version-exlusives as they were in Red and Blue, though this doesn't prove anything because of the Japanese R/G/B fiasco.) Dark Boye00:07, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
FRLG's exclusives were messed with with regards to RG. RB had the same exclusives as RG, FRLG messed with it. The Psyduck and Slowpoke families weren't originally exclusives, while the Mankey and Meowth families were, nor were Shellder's and Staryu's families. For the most part they remain the same between I and III. I'd bet similarly on this. Plus, we used Red and Green in Gen III, so I'd bet they'll keep with the original exclusives, if both families aren't available in both games. Seeing as we've got new Pokémon to deal with, too, I'd bet Gligar and Aipom become somewhat exclusive. TTEchidna08:08, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I bet the version exclusives are Pokémon that have similar evolution that are Version-exclusives like Sneasel and Gligar. Laxafett 17:14, 10 May 2009(UTC)
Latest comment: 10 May 20095 comments4 people in discussion
Hey guys, Serebii.net just got some new shots showing new Ken Sugimori artwork for the Jhoto Starters Chikorita, Cyndaquil, and Totodile. Can someone get the images and put them on the Pokémon's respective pages? Thank you, --Dialgafan100:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Dialgafan1Reply
Cool it, man. Don't you know how much I'm paying attention to all matters HGSS? We can only work so fast. And it's "Johto", not "Jhoto". TTEchidna01:11, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hehe, could we add the screenshot and maybe the artworks to a gallery section for this page? We're gonna need one by next week anyway. Aura-Knight02:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
The archive is still a little crazy from what I understand. Totodile's pic is visible at its page as well. With luck, these problems will be fixed today. Aura-Knight14:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 May 200916 comments11 people in discussion
As the game isn't due for release yet and ESRB quite probably hasn't rated it yet. (Tell me where it says E for these games? The offical site doesn't.) Should we remove the Rating or put the word ASSUMED next to the rating? I know it's most likely to get the E Rating, but I don't think we should jump the gun. Big Nutter02:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't think it's really jumping the gun, since apparently they've been meting out E ratings by merit of being Pokémon (Platinum and PMD2 got pretty...heavy for E-rated games) but yes, it still shouldn't be there.—Loveはドコ? (talk • contribs) 03:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't think game covers really warrant ESRB ratings spikes. Here's my 2¢ prediction: The translation goes a bit too far, and one of the new features teased might be expanded gambling, and as a result, HeartGold and SoulSilver get E10+.
In any event, regardless of anyone's predictions, we probably shouldn't list any rating unless it's officially listed with one. And not just the ESRB--in the event an infobox might be appended to include other countries' rating systems (Japan's CERO, Europe's PEGI, etc.), we're best waiting for official ratings from those boards too. Just because Pokémon games have followed ratings trends doesn't mean they can't be broken--PEGI usually gives Pokémon games 3+ ratings, but Battle Revolution got slapped with a 7+. --Shiningpikablu25204:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Dude, I totally forgot about the Game Corner. Are they using the same rationale the Japanese government uses for pachinko or something? If you don't redeem your chips in the same building as the casino, it's not gambling? :|—Loveはドコ? (talk • contribs) 04:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well TTE, following your idea, then it wouldn't be a M-rated game but rather a T-rated game. Still, I don't think they'll ever give a Pokémon game a rating higher than E or E10+ (if that's ever going to happen =D). It's not like the games have porn or violent contents. Pokemon lover11:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
If they had something like a Kingdom Hearts style where you go around beating the crap out of people for money and to steal their Pokémon, THEN we're talking T or M. Otherwise, they'll all be E or E10+. Seriously. The Game Corner isn't that bad. All of the games have gambling anyways, and they've always passed it off. And it's not even close to real gambling where you lose your home if you go into debt, which you can't. R.A.HunterBlade17:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
And Nintendo isn't stupid. The won't jump from E to T-M for that reason. They'd lose a lot of money if they do it... and you know, they really don't care even if they're taking the poor children to gambling ---Nick., something to say?18:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
A lot of things will get you more into gambling than Pokémon ever could, anyway. Like... your own parents. I'd bet E's where it will be, undoubtedly, and I dare the ESRB to have the balls to prove me wrong. TTEchidna06:24, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
New gameplay video
Latest comment: 27 May 20097 comments7 people in discussion
The new gameplay video reveals the new visual effects. Also aparently your pokemon can now follow you around outside of battle like pikachu in pokemon Yellow. Weather or not this is limited to starter pokemon is unknown. (unless the video states it in japanese, translation of the video is required).
Haha, I was going to say that - this was just shown on Pokémon Sunday, which is an official source, so it is most definitely the most recent update we have, "old" or not. ;) Jazzmoth06:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Nothing significant is said during that video, CloudHiro, don't worry. It basically amounts to Jesus Christ that Chikorita is following him like Ash's Pikachu kajdbgajkdg—Loveはドコ? (talk • contribs) 06:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Probably not yet. When we make the "Aesthetic changes" section, then we can add it. And are we even sure it's New Bark Town? That's another reason why. R.A.HunterBlade03:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Remember that they're remakes just like FR and LG, the story-line will not change much, it will perhaps just be an extension of something. And about the wind, I saw it too but lets just wait until further details. We can't just keep on editing useless information that will just confuse the reader. It is New Bark, but all this type of discussions should be discuss on forums.--AOS06:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeh i agree, I saw Silver staring at the Big house which they say the Elm`s Lab..You`ve got to learn somthing Hunter Blade kiddo...It is the New Bark Town where Elm`s Lab located....And the Chikorita thing there, I think that only starters can come out at their Pokéball....Gio1207:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hey, I've just noticed something! The sign in New Bark Town says "The Town where the winds of a new beginning blow". Now there really is wind there! Taromon77710:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Is it related to the game's release date? I didn't see something about HGSS. It says the release is on September 11, reservation is July 18, SRP is 4800 yen, NEPichu to appear in HG, and more info about the movie and event PCPichu.. not sure of this though. Kevzo812:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
This month's CoroCoro magazine will be released few moments by now. I think we should wait for the infos. Kevzo813:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Eh, the first picture has Lugia and Ho-Oh on it, but I can't see anything else Pokémon related on it. As for the rest of everything, what Kev said. R.A.HunterBlade21:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
CoroCoro Scans
Latest comment: 13 May 200911 comments8 people in discussion
Just wondering if/when the info in the new CC should be added to the article, from what I've seen, there is a new girl playable, the notched eared pichu/pikachu colored pichu are involved, and there's a skateboard involved in the game somehow. I'm aware the last 2 are iffy, but something tells me that the new girl would be something to mention. Myzou14:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I would think that showing the picture or mentioning the new girl would be more of a priority than the Pichu since it notes a significant change between Pokemon Crystal and these games. But I am not going to add this without more discussion.-Tyler5384115:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'd say maybe wait to see if slightly better quality scans are created before adding more details. Although they may still be speculative for the time being. Although the fact that there is a new female character does throw a bit of a spanner in the works. First off, we don't know her name or anything else about her other than her look. TheChrisDRants•Edits15:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
PS - Gold = A really young version of the TF2 Scout?
I would think the scans he posted below would be good enough to show that it is indeed a new playable female character. Myzou15:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
It possibly is true. But, we have to what for some better screenshots. Don't add them just yet. Let TTE decide.--Clarky1316:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'll agree to that and if it can't be posted yet then we'll wait for either offical pictures or a gameplay shot that shows the characters' sprite. -Tyler5384116:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I agree, I think we should wait for the magazine to actually hit news-stand on the 15th. It is the 15th right? Either way I don't think we should jump the gun.
Pokébeach have very recently posted an article with higher-resolution quality scans of CoroCoro. Apparently the Touch Screen how displays the in-game menu, although whether or not it is always there, or you have to press a button to activate it is still unknown.
Also they've confirmed the presence of the location graphic that appears when you enter certain areas, á la FR/LG is back. TheChrisDRants•Edits11:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
You can still press X to access the menu, I assume if you don't want to use the touch screen, (according to the screencap.)I assume they have it setup this way because they might integrate the radio more into the game, so it lets you change stations more easily. Halogen18:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Kris?
Latest comment: 16 May 200912 comments12 people in discussion
Can someone who can read Japanese tell me: Doe the magazine specifically say that it is a new girl? I think it may just be a major overhaul of Kris, but if it says so, then it must be an entirely new character.--Gou22:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
The magazine identifies Gold and [Kris] as simply "Protagonist (Boy)" and "Protagonist (Girl)." That's all that's legible for now; let's wait until full scans arrive.—Loveはドコ? (talk • contribs) 00:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
She really only looks like Leaf in a version of Kris' clothes and a slightly different hairstyle. And Serebii says that she isn't Kris, although they have been known to get things wrong. They do have a number of Japanese reading users like we do though. R.A.HunterBlade00:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Maybe she is a new character, maybe her name could be Soul (ソウル) or Heart (ハート) just like Leaf in FireRed & LeafGreen. AlienX200803:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, nothing is mentioned other than what we know. The description of the girl "An active looking girl. Notice the device hanging from her bag." For the boy, "His cap has a trademarked yellow line. What's that blue device attached to his left hand?" Halogen04:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
What could it be, oh how I wonder... Anyone up for emailing Masuda or Sugimori and asking them personally, "okay, is this Kris and you're screwing with us, and when the hell do we get HGSS?" TTEchidna07:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I highly doubt that's Kris, seeing as the two look VERY different. Either Kris will appear redesigned again in a possible Crystal remake, or we will never see her again. Perhaps all the "Marina" hints in the anime were just teasing us, but we never know, right? ...and for the record, I'm with ya, TTE. Fairy Red12:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree with you there Sketch and personally I don't care about this debate personally it was just Nintendo chose to do and it is not that big of a deal. -Tyler5384115:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
on this subject, she isen't replacing kris, since this is a remake of gold and silver, not crystal. and to my recolection, there is no female player in the origanal g&s
Remember, that video is just demonstration on what the game's gonna be like, it may be scrapped and become beta information.--ForceFire09:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Starters may not be the only ones who can follow, it seems safe to assume that it is possible there are many Pokémon that can follow, I came to this conclusion from the Ilex forest image that has been released, it shows your Pikachu coloured pichu outside of its Poké ball, this could possibly indicate that other Pokémon may be able to follow the player. Basically I don't think we should assume that only the starters can follow (like it says in the article) until we have all the facts. —Mada-sama (Talk to me!)— 13:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah after seeing that special Pichu following the trainer I agree until more facts are available to that, if not for that I would have thought only the starters would follow the trainer. -Tyler5384115:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Being that PCP can, I do wonder if shiny starters would look different, too. Either way, yes, waiting on this tidbit is a good idea. TTEchidna08:37, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Fourth pic
Latest comment: 27 May 200912 comments7 people in discussion
There is no mention of it anywhere in the scans or on the website (I read the Japanese.) The text next to the image in the scans simply refers to how your starter will follow you throughout the game. It should be edited. Halogen18:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Don't. It closely resembles the positioning of Kurt's House in Azalea Town. The gym can be seen below it, and there is a red streak on the western side of the picture resembling a Pokémon Center.--Clarky1319:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Okay, but that is just speculation (and a big stretch.) It doesn't hurt to leave it as is and find out whose house exactly it is later on.Halogen20:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I can't picture Azalea Towns having these kinds of streets, as they would go against its village-ish theme. And the house/tower in the pic seems to have a base of concrete under it with stairs, reminiscent of the towers' bases in the original games (Ok, the bases didn't look like they were made of concrete in GSC, but it still looks reminiscent of them). Pokéman23:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok, maybe. This is getting a bit forumy, you have made your point and fixed it. Anything else goes to forums.--Clarky1323:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
It's not Kurt's house. It's Burned Tower, Kurt's house is not on an elevated platform (and wouldn't be, he's not THAT important). TTEchidna08:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 27 May 20096 comments6 people in discussion
The article says that the new girl replaces Kris. But seeing as HGSS are specifically Gold/Silver remakes, instead of a Crystal remake, wouldn't it make more sense to say this new girl is just new, not a replacement? Just like the FRLG heroine didn't replace anyone because no female choice existed in RGYB, the HGSS girl replaces no-one as well. But that's just me...what do you think? --Fairy Red23:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
We all have different opinions on the topic; check out the various forum threads. For now, we're proceeding as if it's a different character. We've given her the fan-name Soul for now. It's hard to say which way we should go. --((Martonimos))00:08, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
i agree with fairy red. she dosen't replace any character, because there is none to replace.
In most people's eyes, Kris was "the Johto girl" like May's "the Hoenn girl", Leaf's "the Kanto girl", and Dawn's "the Sinnoh girl". Sure, Kris didn't actually appear as a choice in Gold and Silver, but most consider her to be as much Gold's female counterpart as May is to Brendan, Leaf is to Red, and Dawn is to Lucas. It's not as much "replaced" as it is "included instead of the more logical choice"... TTEchidna20:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Even though these are remakes of G/S rather than Crystal, the one who had the role of Gold's female counterpart in the franchise was Kris. And now we have Soul filling that role. So yes, we can say that Soul is replacing Kris. Pokéman02:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I would say that it is a matter of how you look at it. Looking at it from the perspective of these being remakes of Gold and Silver, Soul is not replacing Kris. Looking at it from the perspective of Kris being Gold's female counterpart, Soul is replacing Kris. --Galladeon05:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
All Pokémon NOW Available
Latest comment: 19 May 20096 comments5 people in discussion
As an honorable mention for somewhere on the page, by now, with the addition of the expected Johto Pokémon in these remakes and the expected time capsule to work like the original GS, every Pokémon may be now caught in Gen IV main series gameplay as of these GS remakes... Now, I think that it would be an honorable mention... if it could be edited a bit and figured out where it would be put on the page... that is, if you decide whether it's really an honorable mention...--X, PEACE TOTHE DRAGONS ANDTHE BEASTS03:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well I disagree with you, since I believe there will be a new Johto Dex. But also the point of the matter is that until there is a source to clarify what Nintendo is planning to do, there would be no rumors or speculation about this on the games' page.-Tyler5384103:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
...what? Seriously, I can't tell what you're saying. As far as catching every Pokémon, what about Groudon and Kyogre? Or the Gen III starters? Heck, we don't even know for sure that Celebi is available. --((Martonimos))06:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'd Like to believe that too, but personally I'd rather wait for a reliable source especially since Nintendo did an expansion of the Sinnoh Dex for Platinum and could easy do the same thing in reverse. Especially with the Kanto Starters, Fossil, and Legendaries near the back of the original Johto Dex. But once further details are released then it would be determined who's right or wrong. -Tyler5384107:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 June 200915 comments8 people in discussion
Now it's time for the division between "speculation" and "duh". Honestly, I know we pride ourselves on the veracity and such of our information, but honestly, truly, saying that the Johto Gym Leaders don't even have a 100% chance of reappearing is just stupid. Did Kanto get new Gym Leaders in FRLG? No! HGSS is a remake of GS. Silver appears outside Elm's lab. I'll give Kanto being in the games as speculation, because as much as I hope it is, we've not yet seen the eastern border of New Bark in new graphics, leaving room for doubt. Sure, maybe it was unprogrammed as of the demo, fine, but it does leave room for doubt. But seriously, saying that Johto's leaders aren't gonna be the same is like saying Silver's no longer the rival, just some kid standing outside Elm's lab, and that a new villainous team takes the place of Neo Team Rocket.
HGSS is a remake of Gold and Silver. If you're all so gung-ho about removing "speculation" that Falkner, Bugsy, Whitney, Morty, Chuck, Jasmine, Pryce, and Clair will be in HGSS, I don't know why you've not yet even said "oh just speculation that these are remakes, we won't know for sure until we've compared every plot detail to GS and made sure they're just as similar to them as FRLG are to RG," and label these as "new games set in a mysterious new region".
It's just as much speculation that there are screenshots of Slowpoke Well and Ilex Forest, too, that the Gym Leaders will change. You know, despite them looking like revamped versions of the GS areas, we can never be sure...
Echidna has spoken. All eight Johto Gym Leaders are part of Gen IV and HGSS as much as the eight Kanto ones are part of FRLG. If you wanna assume Kanto's in HGSS, too, go for it. I mean, honestly, these anti-speculation measures are far too ridiculous at this point if you're "playing it safe" like this. Hell, if BP were around when FRLG were announced as much as it is now, we'd have you guys screaming about how "it's not proven that the Seafoam Islands and Cerulean Cave will appear in FRLG"...
I agree. Kanto speculation is one thing, but these are friggin' GS remakes, there is no way in teh fiery pit that the Johto gym leaders aren't there. They'll be keeping all major elements of the region intact. I'll bet they're gonna include Kanto, too, I see no reason why they wouldn't. There's no proof that they're including it, true, but neither is there evidence to the contrary. Plus, what would they do about the Pokemon League? And by the way, that shot of Gold in front of some building that everyone is arguing about, I strongly believe it's the Burned Tower. Honestly, what's more likely to be raised up on a pedestal and look all badass and awesome and junk? An ancient tower with great historical significance that houses the legendary gerbils? Or the house of some old fart who makes Poké Balls? Plus, the roads are paved, which kinda says more of "Ecruteak City" than "Azalea Town" to me. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch!(my talk page)01:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
They changed the female player. Big deal. Kris is most likely gone forever. So what? Get over it. It's a remake. It's SUPPOSED to have minor changes, although this is pretty big for a minor. Nothing spectacular changed for the Kanto remakes, all they did was add a female player, the Sevii Islands, and slightly extend the Team Rocket plot. Deal with it, or just ignore the fact that there are remakes coming out. R.A.HunterBlade03:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Please, stop saying that. We have gotten over it. It's the people who complain about the complaints who keep complaining.
Well R.A., you should've understood (if you haven't yet) that the reason for Kris not supposedly being in HGSS is because they're GS remakes and not Crystal's. And since Kris was introduced in Crystal, it wouldn't make sense to put her where she doesn't fit, don't you think? Pokemon lover10:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
That doesn't mean that people aren't spazzing about Kris not being in there, even if they're told she wasn't even IN G/S. People need to learn to grow up and deal with what happens, even if they don't like it. R.A.HunterBlade12:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Pokemon lover: If it's okay for the R/G remakes to borrow stuff from other games (some GSC Pokémon; many Gen II and III items, including the RSE berries and the HM to learn Waterfall; some GSC music themes), then why would it be so wrong for a G/S remake to borrow stuff from Crystal (such as Kris)?
Before anyone tells me to get over it, I'm not complaining about Kris not being included. I'm just questioning the logic in saying "These are GS remakes, so including anything that comes from Crystal would seem out of place". Spideym18:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Me two cents (A few days late) there's things that are speculation to assume they'll be in, but there's things that are more speculative to assume they're not in. Complicating matters slightly is that Kris was one of those things, but really, still in are: the leaders, team rocket, the starters, kanto, the basic plot. The Dark Fiddler - You enter a poorly lit room...10:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
The whole thing we've been talking about, Spideym, is that people tried/have/talked about adding crap that won't happen. See the first thing that TTE said to start the section to understand. R.A.HunterBlade21:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I was replying to Pokemon lover, not TTEchidna. And no, I don't think TTE was talking about what you're saying. Read his comment again. He was ranting about how the fact that people seem to believe that we shouldn't assume until confirmation that stuff like the Johto Gym Leaders is going to come back in these remakes, is ridiculous, as common sense tells us that they WILL be there. Spideym06:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
No, he's right. We shouldn't assume they'll add anything new. They'd never add "crap that won't happen." Pokémon following you around? Ridiculous. That'll never happen in a main series game except for yellow. --((Martonimos))08:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
And yet, it was revealed that ALL 493 Pokemon are capable of following you. So, do you STILL think it won't happen, hmm? - unsigned comment from PokemonMasterJamal3 (talk • contribs)
Latest comment: 27 May 20094 comments3 people in discussion
I don't know if this is being discussed elseware, but I've noticed that in the trivia sections of certain Generation II Pokémon that received updated colours in their Platinum sprites it's not being mentioned that this happened to alot of other Pokémon.
Their colours are changed so that they match their original colours from Gold and Silver as a hint to the fact that the Gold and Silver remakes were going to be released in a few months time.
For example, in Porygon2's trivia section it mentions that Porygon's sprite colours didn't change in Platinum as if no connection had been made to the G/S remakes.
Okay, so your saying that the Generation II Pokémon having the sprite changes to reference their original sprites in G/S and then the G/S remakes being announced a few months after is a complete co-incidence? Ash zane11:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 June 20095 comments4 people in discussion
Ho-Oh and Lugia in the 3rd Generation games were only available from the event-exclusive Navel Rock. Before the release of HeartGold and SoulSilver, the only way to them in Diamond, Pearl and Platinum, was through Pal Park. However, with the release of HG and SS, now you can get them by trading with HG/SS.
Should it be added to their Trivia sections that they are the only Pokemon to initially be event-exclusive and then be available normally? Bttsstewart02:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I know that, but then should it be said that they are the only ones to be available normally (GEN 2), then event-exclusive (GEN 3), then available normally (GEN 4)? Bttsstewart04:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I examined the address of the japanese site that Google is translating and this www.pokemon.co.jp lodged in there and found it is from the official pokemon site in japan so the release month may in fact be legit. Course the exact date still needs released for this game to prove where the real date is. -Tyler5384120:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Just so you're aware I even if this page wasn't protected I wouldn't have added the month to this site without further consensus or the exact date to do so since I try to avoid obvious mistakes if possible. Besides there no other sources besides this so I won't do anything beyond this. -Tyler5384120:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I might as well mention that September would be written as 9月 in Japanese (note the use of Arabic numerals for months). --Evice20:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Pedometer a.k.a. PokéWalk
Latest comment: 7 June 20097 comments5 people in discussion
Supposedly, there's a pedometer that will come with the game, and you can upload a Pokémon to it. Then, you can walk around, and the Pokémon will supposedly gain experience. I'm not kidding. If you think I'm crazy, then check out these links: [1][2] Shouldn't this be mentioned here, especially when the first link has a video from Pokémon Sunday (a primary source)? Blaziken25705:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
This pedometer is going to be called the PokéWalk. Additionally it was announced on Pokémon Sunday (6/7/09) and is also at Serebii(http://www.serebii.net/index2.shtml). Also, I started on it in the Sandbox but was told to hold off on doing anything with it. Lastly, there is a picture on the Serebii newspost. -MasterKenobi05:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm, it looks interesting, and given that you have at least one reliable source, then write something up and see what the others think. However, one thing that those pictures on Serebii indicate is that the HG/SS Pokémon might be using the Platinum D/P (oops!) sprites, unless that's just a filler. TheChrisDRants•Edits17:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I already wrote up something and asked two admins. It is located in the sandbox. I was told by the admins to hold off until more information is available. -MasterKenobi18:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well the way I can figure it from my analysis is that the the three Hoenn Legendaries have a better chance of being posted on this page first being that is more notable than the Arceus event. But once an administrator makes the choice it doens't matter to me if it will be full, partial, or no addition to the page. -Tyler5384116:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
They're both gonna be put up... don't worry about it. The admins would already know about it without people asking. They're like vultures over a dying animal. R.A.HunterBlade21:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 June 200910 comments5 people in discussion
Firstly I would like to applaud you Sketch for removing the unneeded images since I had the same idea myself about not wanting the section to be too overcrowded.
But now the Boxart has been revealed as CoroCoro scans I am wondering if it should be posted because of its importance or postponed till better images are aquired? Course I am willing to wait over being too hasty. -Tyler5384116:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
If I can have an opinion, I would say we should hold off as the news article said the Lugia and Ho-Oh on the box are don't match the official Japanese website. The only thing that could actually verify it that I would agree with is if someone compared the Lugia and Ho-Oh with the Lugia and Ho-Oh that were revealed on Pokémon Sunday, if they match then I would say it is a go... -MasterKenobi17:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Last comment has my support since this was intended to affect when the box art should be posted on the page at some point in the near future and this is not supposed to be a forum chat. -Tyler5384118:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I was talking about the "everyone's paying attention LIKE A HAWK" and the "We will have stuff up and ready as soon as time allows" parts. Sorry about the confusion. And I appreciate that you aren't spazzing like some users who would if you were them... R.A.HunterBlade18:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
It is because I am a patient person who is used to waiting and since this has value I just wanted to know what the game plan was. I may watch over this page, but I only comment when I feel I need to. If this situation had little importance like an average screenshot then I wouldn't have done anything. -Tyler5384118:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
That's fine. I'm making sure you know. A lot of people tend to miss those, even though they're bigger than anything else on the page. xD R.A.HunterBlade18:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
My opinion on the boxart: too small at the current time for our purposes. We'll get it up probably in a few weeks when it appears on websites and such in high-res format. TTEchidna00:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree with you there since the boxart is mixed in with the Magazine scan and it is better to wait for pictures that have no magazine scan in them. So this pretty much ends the discussion of the topic of when the should the boxart pictures should be posted on this page. No need to add anything to the discussion at this point -Tyler5384103:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 June 20093 comments3 people in discussion
I put in a bit about the new area near the National Park, but it was removed a few hours later with the comment "We'll wait until we know what that area is". We don't even know for sure that Soul isn't Kris (and that her name is Soul), yet she has an entire article. Should my thing be put back in? --Galladeon03:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't see a reason to mention it yet. We don't even know what it is. You weren't supposed to be able to edit the article anyway. The protection expired. -Sketch10:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
On the one hand, it's official information. On the other hand, it's not much information. I guess we'll wait until we know more, although I agree that too many BP users are revert-happy. --((Martonimos))19:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Confirmed?
Latest comment: 14 June 20095 comments4 people in discussion
All 493 Pokemon can follow you? Is that correct? I mean, I can't imagine a Pokemon the size of Regigigas following me into a house. Team Hyper (talk • contribs)
Just because there is a picture with a wobbufett, pichu, cyndaquil, and steelix doesn't necessarily mean all 493 Pokémon can follow you around. -MasterKenobi02:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps... There's a restriction for certain exotic Pokémon, So if you want to take your Giratina for a walk, you'll probably get a message like, "It's too big!".
The scans may say otherwise, but I can see this happening. Evidence for this is that Rayquasa appears in-game, and his sprite is pretty large, so I really think there'll be restrictions of sort. Team Hyper
Do not discuss this here. I only allowed your original comment because it was asking if that was correct. All 493 Pokemon can follow you. There are no restrictions. Period. 493 means 493. -Sketch11:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
New gameplay images
Latest comment: 15 June 20091 comment1 person in discussion
Now, there's more gameplay images, someone should put this here but it's protected.