Talk:Super-ancient Pokémon: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 24 July 2009 by Saiph charon in topic Trio or not?
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
Galladeon (talk | contribs)
Trio or not?: new section
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
  This is the only legendary trio whose members do not all have the same base stat total; Groudon and Kyogre share a total of 670, while Rayquaza's is 680. This fits with its role as a mediator between Groudon and Kyogre.
  This is the only legendary trio whose members do not all have the same base stat total; Groudon and Kyogre share a total of 670, while Rayquaza's is 680. This fits with its role as a mediator between Groudon and Kyogre.
This shows major differences in the things that normal define a trio. --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 04:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
This shows major differences in the things that normal define a trio. --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 04:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Exactly, Rayquaza is a "guardian" like Lugia and Ho-oh (note the flying type and 680BST btw). With this I mean that it acts intelligent, whereas Groundon and Kyogre simply go on rampage when awakened. One could also find connections between Groudon, Kyogre and Regigigas, the other 670 legend, which is also sealed away in a hybernating state. But the Weather trio is a weather duo with their guardian. Especially considering that Rayquaza is superior to them in more ways:
-a secondary type
-red, black plus yellow patterns on it's body
-680BST instead of 670
-it's ability deactivates the duos abilities instead of creating it's own weather
--[[User:Saiph charon|Saiph charon]] 09:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:18, 24 July 2009

I Calls 'Em The Geo Trio

I call these guys the Geographical Trio, or Geo Trio for short, because they rule the environment, namely oceans, landforms, and the sky.TorchicBlaziken (talk) 00:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

What does this have to do with the Trio?--Coolピカチュウ! 01:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
In reality, I was actually thinking of moving another one of the trios' pages from a name I gave them to another, better one. That'd be the lake trio, to legendary pixies. That'd fit better with the other three. TTEchidna 02:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Trio or not?

Is this group really a legendary trio? They don't really fit in with the norms from the other trios. As it says on Rayquaza's trivia:

Rayquaza is the only trio master that is actually a member of its own trio.
Out of the weather trio, it is the only one of the trio with a secondary type.

Then in the text of this page, it says:

This is the only legendary trio whose members do not all have the same base stat total; Groudon and Kyogre share a total of 670, while Rayquaza's is 680. This fits with its role as a mediator between Groudon and Kyogre.

This shows major differences in the things that normal define a trio. --ルレ 04:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


Exactly, Rayquaza is a "guardian" like Lugia and Ho-oh (note the flying type and 680BST btw). With this I mean that it acts intelligent, whereas Groundon and Kyogre simply go on rampage when awakened. One could also find connections between Groudon, Kyogre and Regigigas, the other 670 legend, which is also sealed away in a hybernating state. But the Weather trio is a weather duo with their guardian. Especially considering that Rayquaza is superior to them in more ways: -a secondary type -red, black plus yellow patterns on it's body -680BST instead of 670 -it's ability deactivates the duos abilities instead of creating it's own weather --Saiph charon 09:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply