Talk:Meowth (Team Rocket)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 14 November 2009 by Samjohn95 in topic Meowth (Team Rocket)
Disagree |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*The article is very well built and extremely full of info. '''Support'''--[[User:Pikachuawsome|Pikachuawsome]] | *The article is very well built and extremely full of info. '''Support'''--[[User:Pikachuawsome|Pikachuawsome]] | ||
====Object ( | ====Object (3)==== | ||
*'''Disagree.''' This article is decent, but by no means FAC-worthy. <s>No movesets are done (which I'll do now), and </s>there is no manga info. There is too much text in the summary section... not very organized... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#B69E00"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#E1E1E1"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 22:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | *'''Disagree.''' This article is decent, but by no means FAC-worthy. <s>No movesets are done (which I'll do now), and </s>there is no manga info. There is too much text in the summary section... not very organized... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#B69E00"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#E1E1E1"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 22:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''No.''' It's OK, but no Featured article. It's incomplete, anyway. [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 21:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | *'''No.''' It's OK, but no Featured article. It's incomplete, anyway. [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 21:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
* Sorry, but '''No'''. I don't see how an incomplete article can be considered for a featured article in the first place. If the Manga section was done, then I would gladly change my veiws, but... From [[User:Samjohn95|<font color="Blue">Sam</font>]][[User talk:Samjohn95|<font color="Purple">john</font>]][[Special:contributions/Samjohn95|<font color="Teal">95</font>]] 23:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
Revision as of 23:25, 14 November 2009
Support (2)
- It is a very detailed and descriptive article. Support.--Smartkidhen 23:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- The article is very well built and extremely full of info. Support--Pikachuawsome
Object (3)
- Disagree. This article is decent, but by no means FAC-worthy.
No movesets are done (which I'll do now), andthere is no manga info. There is too much text in the summary section... not very organized... ht14 22:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- No. It's OK, but no Featured article. It's incomplete, anyway. CuboneKing 21:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, but No. I don't see how an incomplete article can be considered for a featured article in the first place. If the Manga section was done, then I would gladly change my veiws, but... From Samjohn95 23:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
