Talk:DP164: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 11 February 2010 by Quagbert in topic No DP164 on February 18?
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
No DP164 on February 18?
 
Quagbert (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Hey guys, I just noticed that Tv Tokyo schedule haven't revealed DP 164 for 18th Feb. Check this out http://www.tv-tokyo.co.jp/program/detail/19406_201002181900.html . I don't know why but RIOLU is mentioned on the article instead of DP 164. So, can anybody explain this thing please? --<span style="color:#00DD00">♫♪</span>[[User:Adyniz|<span style="color:#FF7327;">'''Ady'''</span>]][[User talk:Adyniz|<span style="color:#FF7327;">'''niz'''</span>]]<span style="color:#00DD00">♪♫</span> 02:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey guys, I just noticed that Tv Tokyo schedule haven't revealed DP 164 for 18th Feb. Check this out http://www.tv-tokyo.co.jp/program/detail/19406_201002181900.html . I don't know why but RIOLU is mentioned on the article instead of DP 164. So, can anybody explain this thing please? --<span style="color:#00DD00">♫♪</span>[[User:Adyniz|<span style="color:#FF7327;">'''Ady'''</span>]][[User talk:Adyniz|<span style="color:#FF7327;">'''niz'''</span>]]<span style="color:#00DD00">♪♫</span> 02:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
:I didn't see any mention of Riolu on the page you linked to; that must have been a mistake that they've since corrected. [[User:Quagbert|Quagbert]] 20:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:46, 11 February 2010

No DP164 on February 18?

Hey guys, I just noticed that Tv Tokyo schedule haven't revealed DP 164 for 18th Feb. Check this out http://www.tv-tokyo.co.jp/program/detail/19406_201002181900.html . I don't know why but RIOLU is mentioned on the article instead of DP 164. So, can anybody explain this thing please? --♫♪Adyniz♪♫ 02:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I didn't see any mention of Riolu on the page you linked to; that must have been a mistake that they've since corrected. Quagbert 20:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply