Talk:Pokémon of Myth orbs: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 28 July 2013 by Ensephylon in topic Title
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
Pumpkinking0192 (talk | contribs)
Created page with "==Title== Does anyone else think the current title, '''timespace orbs''', sounds a bit silly? The word order generally used is "spacetime", but as that also excludes Giratina,..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Title==
==Title==
Does anyone else think the current title, '''timespace orbs''', sounds a bit silly? The word order generally used is "spacetime", but as that also excludes Giratina, I suggest we simply go for a parallel construction with the term "[[creation trio]]" and move this to "'''creation orbs'''". Does anyone agree? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 17:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Does anyone else think the current title, '''timespace orbs''', sounds a bit silly? The word order generally used is "spacetime", but as that also excludes Giratina, I suggest we simply go for a parallel construction with the term "[[creation trio]]" and move this to "'''creation orbs'''". Does anyone agree? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 17:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
* Well, the term "timespace" comes from the Darkrai movie, I think, so it does have a more canonical basis than "spacetime" in this case. However, I do agree that "creation orbs" would match "creation trio" better, especially since that is what this site calls the trio by (although personally I prefer "spacetime/timespace trio" for technical reasons, but that's neither here nor there). [[User:Ensephylon|Ensephylon]] ([[User talk:Ensephylon|talk]]) 20:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:28, 28 July 2013

Title

Does anyone else think the current title, timespace orbs, sounds a bit silly? The word order generally used is "spacetime", but as that also excludes Giratina, I suggest we simply go for a parallel construction with the term "creation trio" and move this to "creation orbs". Does anyone agree? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 17:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Well, the term "timespace" comes from the Darkrai movie, I think, so it does have a more canonical basis than "spacetime" in this case. However, I do agree that "creation orbs" would match "creation trio" better, especially since that is what this site calls the trio by (although personally I prefer "spacetime/timespace trio" for technical reasons, but that's neither here nor there). Ensephylon (talk) 20:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply