Talk:Agatha's Gengar: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 29 September 2013 by Pattyman
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
No edit summary
Pattyman (talk | contribs)
I didn't notice this until now.
Line 4: Line 4:
::Try to explain yourself next time! =p
::Try to explain yourself next time! =p
::As for me, I think the article is very good. It might be the next one I bring up in the forum discussion thread to bring more publicity to it. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
::As for me, I think the article is very good. It might be the next one I bring up in the forum discussion thread to bring more publicity to it. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
:::Kenji-girl already deemed Agatha's Gengar as unnotable for its own article before. It was also mentioned in the history section as well (even got protected for edit warring). [[User:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Patty</span>]][[User talk:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Man</span>]] 17:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:58, 29 September 2013

This article's been sitting in the userspace for a while now, but I think it looks good enough to be mainspaced...anyone else have other thoughts? GamerGeek 22:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

No. --The Truth aka Relicant 22:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Try to explain yourself next time! =p
As for me, I think the article is very good. It might be the next one I bring up in the forum discussion thread to bring more publicity to it. MaverickNate 22:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Kenji-girl already deemed Agatha's Gengar as unnotable for its own article before. It was also mentioned in the history section as well (even got protected for edit warring). PattyMan 17:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply