Talk:Alola Route 11: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 4 December 2016 by Jaxon in topic Commented out sections
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
No edit summary
Jaxon (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:
::Is this a new practice then? Because I can remember several pages for XY/ORAS that didn't have encounter rates defined yet (displayed as "??%"). [[User:Jaxon|Jaxon]] ([[User talk:Jaxon|talk]]) 04:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
::Is this a new practice then? Because I can remember several pages for XY/ORAS that didn't have encounter rates defined yet (displayed as "??%"). [[User:Jaxon|Jaxon]] ([[User talk:Jaxon|talk]]) 04:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
:::I personally was not around for the development of those pages, but if that's how it was then, it does seem like it is a new practice. [[User:TechSkylander1518|TechSkylander1518]] ([[User talk:TechSkylander1518|talk]]) 04:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
:::I personally was not around for the development of those pages, but if that's how it was then, it does seem like it is a new practice. [[User:TechSkylander1518|TechSkylander1518]] ([[User talk:TechSkylander1518|talk]]) 04:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
::::I still find it odd that they would be commented out based on unverified encounter rates, as I still see usefulness in at least seeing what Pokémon are avaliable in at a location, but that's just my personal opinion. At any rate, thank you for taking the time to help me. [[User:Jaxon|Jaxon]] ([[User talk:Jaxon|talk]]) 04:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:21, 4 December 2016

Commented out sections

I've noticed that on a lot of location pages (like this one), the Pokémon tables are commented out, and was wondering if someone might be able to provide an explanation as to why this is. Jaxon (talk) 04:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

It's because they're still in development. Keeping them commented out lets them be worked on until missing information (like encounter rates) can be decided on, at which point they are made visible. TechSkylander1518 (talk) 04:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Is this a new practice then? Because I can remember several pages for XY/ORAS that didn't have encounter rates defined yet (displayed as "??%"). Jaxon (talk) 04:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
I personally was not around for the development of those pages, but if that's how it was then, it does seem like it is a new practice. TechSkylander1518 (talk) 04:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
I still find it odd that they would be commented out based on unverified encounter rates, as I still see usefulness in at least seeing what Pokémon are avaliable in at a location, but that's just my personal opinion. At any rate, thank you for taking the time to help me. Jaxon (talk) 04:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply