Talk:Giant Rock: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 28 January 2018 by GrammarFreak01 in topic What exactly is wrong with this article?
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I notice the article has a cleanup template, but I'm not sure what exactly is wrong with it. It looks fine from my standpoint. Care for an explanation? [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 03:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | I notice the article has a cleanup template, but I'm not sure what exactly is wrong with it. It looks fine from my standpoint. Care for an explanation? [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 03:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
:That template was added [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Giant_Rock&direction=next&oldid=2508508 when the page looked like this], so I think it's a fair assumption that it's only still there because nobody bothered to remove it. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 03:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | :That template was added [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Giant_Rock&direction=next&oldid=2508508 when the page looked like this], so I think it's a fair assumption that it's only still there because nobody bothered to remove it. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 03:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
::Ah, okay. Thanks for the clarification. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 04:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:49, 28 January 2018
Giant Rock
Isn't Giant Rock the dub name for the Megalith? I had been waiting to make a page regarding it and its Zygarde form until we got the dub of the Team Flare finale, but now that it's up I think it warrants a look. --The Great Butler (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
What exactly is wrong with this article?
I notice the article has a cleanup template, but I'm not sure what exactly is wrong with it. It looks fine from my standpoint. Care for an explanation? GrammarFreak01 (talk) 03:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- That template was added when the page looked like this, so I think it's a fair assumption that it's only still there because nobody bothered to remove it. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 03:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. Thanks for the clarification. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 04:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
