Talk:U: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 2 October 2007 by Fabu-Vinny in topic Why?
Fabu-Vinny (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
→Glitchy Charizard Sprite?: new section |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Because it's junk. NO ONE at all wants to read about a glitched {{p|Charizard}}. By that standard, why not have a seperate article for EVERY Pokémon that can be caught using the Mew glitch? I say merge it with the trivia on the Pokémon's page. It's far too trivial to warrant its own article. Even then, a glitch Pokémon should only have some reference on here if it's especially notable in some way, and then I think they should all be combined into one article, "Glitch Pokémon." -[[Image:Spr 3e 186.gif|30px]][[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">Politoed</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">666</span>]][[Image:Spr 3e 186.gif|30px]] | :Because it's junk. NO ONE at all wants to read about a glitched {{p|Charizard}}. By that standard, why not have a seperate article for EVERY Pokémon that can be caught using the Mew glitch? I say merge it with the trivia on the Pokémon's page. It's far too trivial to warrant its own article. Even then, a glitch Pokémon should only have some reference on here if it's especially notable in some way, and then I think they should all be combined into one article, "Glitch Pokémon." -[[Image:Spr 3e 186.gif|30px]][[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">Politoed</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">666</span>]][[Image:Spr 3e 186.gif|30px]] | ||
::The fact that no one else has a vendetta against glitch Pokémon suggests that you can't talk for everyone. Some people happen find it interesting and the glitch category has been around for two years without a fuss. Also, why are you targeting the ''good'' quality articles? --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Fabu-Vinny|C]]-[[User:Fabu-Vinny/Sandbox|S]]</sup> 02:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | ::The fact that no one else has a vendetta against glitch Pokémon suggests that you can't talk for everyone. Some people happen find it interesting and the glitch category has been around for two years without a fuss. Also, why are you targeting the ''good'' quality articles? --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Fabu-Vinny|C]]-[[User:Fabu-Vinny/Sandbox|S]]</sup> 02:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Glitchy Charizard Sprite? == | |||
I've never captured this Glitch before and because of that I don't know the sprite. At first I thought it was just a normal Charizard Sprite from Yellow. However, with Glitches I'm never too sure. So does anybody know what this Glitch looks like? -- [[User:Boxman|Boxman]], a guy who works with Glitches. | |||
Revision as of 18:26, 9 June 2008
Why?
Why delete this? TinaTheKirlia ♥ File:281MS.gif 01:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Because it's junk. NO ONE at all wants to read about a glitched Charizard. By that standard, why not have a seperate article for EVERY Pokémon that can be caught using the Mew glitch? I say merge it with the trivia on the Pokémon's page. It's far too trivial to warrant its own article. Even then, a glitch Pokémon should only have some reference on here if it's especially notable in some way, and then I think they should all be combined into one article, "Glitch Pokémon." -File:Spr 3e 186.gifPolitoed666File:Spr 3e 186.gif
- The fact that no one else has a vendetta against glitch Pokémon suggests that you can't talk for everyone. Some people happen find it interesting and the glitch category has been around for two years without a fuss. Also, why are you targeting the good quality articles? --FabuVinny T-C-S 02:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Glitchy Charizard Sprite?
I've never captured this Glitch before and because of that I don't know the sprite. At first I thought it was just a normal Charizard Sprite from Yellow. However, with Glitches I'm never too sure. So does anybody know what this Glitch looks like? -- Boxman, a guy who works with Glitches.
