User talk:ElectAbuzzzz/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎IM BORED?: NO....)
Line 80: Line 80:


No, we're superpeople!--[[User:Kuki|<span style="color:#b00000;">Kuki</span>]][[User talk:Kuki|<span style="color:#2c40a4;">Ta</span><span style="color:#049440;">lk</span>]] 13:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
No, we're superpeople!--[[User:Kuki|<span style="color:#b00000;">Kuki</span>]][[User talk:Kuki|<span style="color:#2c40a4;">Ta</span><span style="color:#049440;">lk</span>]] 13:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
I believe the term is "Pokefags"

Revision as of 13:34, 9 August 2008

Hello and welcome to Bulbapedia. Carnivine

Please use <ab> or <br /> to force line breaks, not paragraph breaks. - 振霖T 12:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Please use sort keys that are not just one letter long. - 振霖T 13:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Reply

Well, I tend to think of it like this: Nero and Orville were the equivalent to characters of the day, and in their episode outshone the human counterpart. Personally, I don't think the articles on Vicious's Pokémon are necessary, as are the articles about Paul's Pokémon that he owned for one episode. In fact, the other day somebody tried creating an article about a Raichu who was owned by a character of the day. Another administrator deleted it, saying that Pokémon owned by CotDs are non-notable. This actually is kind of a vague area, and I might have to bring up the issue with my fellow sysops. I think it goes too far when the Pokémon didn't play too big of a role in its episode AND was never heard from again. Examples: Vicious's Scizor, Paul's Azumarill, Murkrow (which hasn't even debuted yet!), and Weavile, who we don't even know if he'll keep. I'll bring it up with the other staff and get their opinions on it. --PAK Man Talk 16:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, we couldn't really come to a consensus. What we did decide, however, is that Pokémon belonging to characters of the day shouldn't have their own articles. Personally, I wouldn't see anything wrong with writing an article about Surge's Raichu or something like that. After all, if we have an article about Paul's Azumarill and Vicious's Tyranitar, I don't think it would hurt to have an article about a gym leader's main Pokémon. --PAK Man Talk 02:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Time away

Hi everybody... Just thought I'd let you know I won't be here for the next week or so cause I'm going to join a Taglit group tomorrow. I'll be back... Probably next Wednesday, or maybe Thursday... See ya. --ElectAbuzzzz 15:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

And I'm back...--ElectAbuzzzz 19:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back.You were the first person to revert meEmperor's Cookies 11:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

To be honest...

...I myself haven't been here for quite some time. In fact, today is my first post since at least mid-June. I haven't been being a good administrator lately, and unfortunately I cannot really help you with the situation, as I am not exactly familiar with it. You may want to try talking to Shiningpikablu252, as they have been much more active than I've been. Sorry about the inability to help, but I really need to get myself reacquainted with this place just like you. --PAK Man Talk 15:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Thanks for the invite! I'd be more than happy to help with the project. --PAK Man Talk 15:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

vandal

Is there no way to block him?--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 13:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Not without a sysop, we need to alert them. Talk pages are no good, we need IM or something... --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 13:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Looks like he's distracted for now--KukiTalk 13:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Or just tired. Stay on lookout. --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 13:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
No matter what, I WILL put that delete tag on both his user and usertalk pages. I'll also be on the look-out for the stupid mainspace edits.--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 13:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
I wake up and come on Bulbapedia to THIS GUY!? D: Anyone able to contact a Sysop? Cause right now i think we reaaaally need one... Takoto タコト| サソデイ = 愛 13:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I know, right? Does that mean we have to stay here instead of watching DP069?--KukiTalk 13:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Anybody has AIM? That way we could contact TTE... --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 13:14, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
I don't have AIM on my laptop, sorry D: I can not be much help here...I guess. Takoto タコト| サソデイ = 愛 13:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

IM BORED?

YOU edit POKEMON pages all day.

That's because unlike you, we are Pokémon fans. Now shut up your mouth and your stupid computer down.--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 13:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm...I AM a pokemon fan oh hoh!

You idiot, why don't you just shut up and leave us alone?--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 13:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

...beee....cause?

YOU"RE DESTROYING BULBAPEDIA, THE BEST ENGLISH POKéMON ENCYCLOPEDIA AROUND--KukiTalk 13:21, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

WOW im impressed and you people dont even seem to speak english very well.

Shut up!--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 13:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Isn't Juan Sanfiel an admin?--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 13:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

What? No... --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 13:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I can't help but wonder if they're an EDer trying to stir up drama for some lulz.--Exxthus 13:25, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry i am not an EDer however you are half right

Generic troller, one would think. Glinn Mgraw 13:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sweet. Seriously, though, aside from a few dedicated members, you're not doing a whole lot. One click of "revert" and all your trolling is undone. There are better ways to cause drama, my trolling friend.--Exxthus 13:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

1.Not a troll. 2.Im just an asshole. 3.I dont give a fuck if you revert it =/ i already had my lulz

Begs the question of why you're still here then.
Are you perhaps raging against the dying of the light? Glinn Mgraw 13:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually im still here because its "Getting to you people"

Actually i refrain from that statement...You arent people

No, we're superpeople!--KukiTalk 13:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I believe the term is "Pokefags"