Talk:Ash's Pikachu/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (added support for FA status) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (7)==== | ||
*I'll go with it. Pikachu's page is at least as good as Ash and the Pikachu to English translations are especially convincing. Only objection is that the main article fizzles a bit towards the end. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 16:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | *I'll go with it. Pikachu's page is at least as good as Ash and the Pikachu to English translations are especially convincing. Only objection is that the main article fizzles a bit towards the end. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 16:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Hmm... I guess he's right. I certainly like this one better than most other FACs. The only improvements I could suggest are to cut down on trivia by incorporating them into the main article (perhaps we could create a "gender debate" section to help with this?). (EDIT: as of 7/25/08 at 8:00 AST, {{u|Aura-Knight}} has made the changes I suggested, so now I'm more fully behind this.) --[[User:Martonimos|<font color="#008000">Martonimos</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Martonimos|((<font color="#00FF00">Argh</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Martonimos|<font color="#50C878">Blargh</font>))]]</sub> 23:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | *Hmm... I guess he's right. I certainly like this one better than most other FACs. The only improvements I could suggest are to cut down on trivia by incorporating them into the main article (perhaps we could create a "gender debate" section to help with this?). (EDIT: as of 7/25/08 at 8:00 AST, {{u|Aura-Knight}} has made the changes I suggested, so now I'm more fully behind this.) --[[User:Martonimos|<font color="#008000">Martonimos</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Martonimos|((<font color="#00FF00">Argh</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Martonimos|<font color="#50C878">Blargh</font>))]]</sub> 23:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*Yes.[[User:Shadow1337|Shadow1337]] 23:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | *Yes.[[User:Shadow1337|Shadow1337]] 23:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
*I'd like to add my support for it getting Featured Article status. It's well written, informative, and as [[User:Martonimos|<font color="#008000">Martonimos</font>]] pointed out, the section on Pikachu's "language" is a great addition. --[[User:Mikekearn|<font color="#0000FF">Mike</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mikekearn|<font color="#000088">Contrib</font>]] 08:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | *I'd like to add my support for it getting Featured Article status. It's well written, informative, and as [[User:Martonimos|<font color="#008000">Martonimos</font>]] pointed out, the section on Pikachu's "language" is a great addition. --[[User:Mikekearn|<font color="#0000FF">Mike</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mikekearn|<font color="#000088">Contrib</font>]] 08:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
*I support it, since it's obviously well researched and well thought out. The information is accurate and complete, if not, then errors are very few. Two thumbs up. --[[User:JirachiWishmaker0802|JirachiWishmaker0802]] 04:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
====Object (3)==== | ====Object (3)==== | ||
Revision as of 04:04, 17 October 2008
Support (7)
- I'll go with it. Pikachu's page is at least as good as Ash and the Pikachu to English translations are especially convincing. Only objection is that the main article fizzles a bit towards the end. Aura-Knight 16:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm... I guess he's right. I certainly like this one better than most other FACs. The only improvements I could suggest are to cut down on trivia by incorporating them into the main article (perhaps we could create a "gender debate" section to help with this?). (EDIT: as of 7/25/08 at 8:00 AST, Aura-Knight has made the changes I suggested, so now I'm more fully behind this.) --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 23:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- I go with cause it's a good page and very well written in some ways--CoolPikachu! 04:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, THis article features one of the main chracters of the show. Elbutler 11:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I think Pikachu is worth of being a Featured article. §#!π¥£!Ψ@Ϛ#µ 03:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- This is one of the best articles written about an anime Pokémon. Deemack199725 09:19, 05 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes.Shadow1337 23:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'd like to add my support for it getting Featured Article status. It's well written, informative, and as Martonimos pointed out, the section on Pikachu's "language" is a great addition. --Mike | Contrib 08:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- I support it, since it's obviously well researched and well thought out. The information is accurate and complete, if not, then errors are very few. Two thumbs up. --JirachiWishmaker0802 04:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Object (3)
- I don't think this choice is very original and it isn't what I would say is one of the best, and I think that there are more note-worthy articles out there. MoldyOrange 23:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- I concur, its nomination is bunkDCM 13:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- We can do better. Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links11:44 15 Aug 2008
Other comments
In response to your comment Moldy Orange, most of those other articles are already nominated. Pikachu is probably the best anime Pokémon page. Aura-Knight 13:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- A lot of people will ignore this because it's a main character page, but unlike Ash, I believe this one actually has merit. The "language" section especially shows a great deal of research, and not the level you'd expect from some fangirl. I just want to make clear that we're not necessarily supporting this because "i <3 pikachu", although some of us might, but because we think it's a well-thought out article. I mean, come on, guys; I hate the anime and everything associated with it. --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 18:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
