Talk:Latias (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 3 March 2009 by The dark lord trombonator in topic Arceus
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Yes, Arceus can be a Flying-type due to plates, so it doesn't count. Don't forget, use four tildes to sign your posts. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 09:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | :Yes, Arceus can be a Flying-type due to plates, so it doesn't count. Don't forget, use four tildes to sign your posts. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 09:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Then some should change Latios's version because it's trivia includes | ::Then some should change Latios's version because it's trivia includes Arceus. [[User:riggins|Riggy(>0.0)>]] | ||
Revision as of 09:44, 3 March 2009
Is it worth putting in the trivia that Latias and Latios are the only legendary Pokemon confirmed by the games to be species and not individuals? Except for maybe Manaphy, since something had to have laid the egg. - Celebi96
Multiple Mew and Lugia have been seen too.1337Fire ►strike! 14:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)- What I meant was, it's not really correct-ish because it's really possible there are others. Take Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres in Pokémon Snap for example. 1337Fire ►strike! 14:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I forgot about Snap. Thanks, sorry. - Celebi96
Arceus
"Latias is one of the few non-Flying-types who can learn Fly. The others are Mew, Smeargle, Vibrava, Flygon, Latios, and Giratina."
Does that mean that Arceus counts as flying type do to plates? Riggy(>0.0)>
- Yes, Arceus can be a Flying-type due to plates, so it doesn't count. Don't forget, use four tildes to sign your posts. — THE TROM — 09:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Then some should change Latios's version because it's trivia includes Arceus. Riggy(>0.0)>
