Talk:Ilex Forest shrine/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 21 July 2009 by RexRacer in topic Ilex Forest shrine
mNo edit summary |
m ohwait |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
***Did it appear in the TCG, Nate? If it didn't, we don't need a section. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 23:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | ***Did it appear in the TCG, Nate? If it didn't, we don't need a section. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 23:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
*I would love to see one of the Featured Stubs make it as a featured article. We have improved this article a whole lot, and we should show it off. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | *I would love to see one of the Featured Stubs make it as a featured article. We have improved this article a whole lot, and we should show it off. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
*This definitely is very good. Amazingly thorough and clear, it's made an amazing improvement in the past weeks. | *This definitely is very good. Amazingly thorough and clear, it's made an amazing improvement in the past weeks.--[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font>]][[User talk:RexRacer|<font color="#42528C ">Racer</font>''']] 23:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
====Object (0)==== | ====Object (0)==== | ||
Revision as of 23:48, 21 July 2009
Support (4)
- A few weeks ago this was a featured stub. Now I think it could be a featured article. It's well written, has all relevant information in all canons, and is just good. It really is. --electAbuzzzz 16:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- I also support the promotion of this article. It has sections for the three main media (games, anime, manga), with all the events in these canons highly detailed. I have no hesitation in voting for this article (and indeed had considered nominating it myself. Damn your mindreading skills, Buzzy!) —darklordtrom 23:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- The above comment makes me pissed; find the reason why. MaverickNate 23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Did it appear in the TCG, Nate? If it didn't, we don't need a section. —darklordtrom 23:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- The above comment makes me pissed; find the reason why. MaverickNate 23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would love to see one of the Featured Stubs make it as a featured article. We have improved this article a whole lot, and we should show it off. MaverickNate 23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- This definitely is very good. Amazingly thorough and clear, it's made an amazing improvement in the past weeks.--RexRacer 23:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
