Talk:MissingNo./Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>==[[Missingno.]]==__NOTOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>==[[Missingno.]]==__NOTOC__</noinclude> | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (8)==== | ||
* The best article on Glitch Pokémon this place has to offer. Detailed, organized, you name it. [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] says: The [[User:Missingno. Master/Celebi Glitch|Celebi Glitch]] is real!<small>[[User talk: Missingno. Master|(talk page)]]</small> 11:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | * The best article on Glitch Pokémon this place has to offer. Detailed, organized, you name it. [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] says: The [[User:Missingno. Master/Celebi Glitch|Celebi Glitch]] is real!<small>[[User talk: Missingno. Master|(talk page)]]</small> 11:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
* This article is, in my honest opinion, certainly the most exquisite article on all of Bulbapedia. I am glad that MissingNo. nowadays is treated as a real Pokemon, even though it only appeared in one generation. Its fame and the fact that it started the entire culture of glitching in the Pokemon games makes MissingNo. the king of the reverse side of the Pokemon franchise - the side involving delving under the skin of the games and revealing hidden secrets. MissingNo. deserves an FA; the article is very maturely written and includes many very balanced and evened-out sections with enough pictures in the right places. It shows true, honest research and gives brilliant insight into the dark world of glitches and the strange unknown of Pokemon. From my point of view MissingNo. is Bulbapedia's magnum opus article, and should win the award to let the community know that the discovery of the MissingNo. species is an amazingly fascinating milestone event in the Pokemon franchise and will be remembered for years to come. [[User:Dusknoir477|Dusknoir477]] 12:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | * This article is, in my honest opinion, certainly the most exquisite article on all of Bulbapedia. I am glad that MissingNo. nowadays is treated as a real Pokemon, even though it only appeared in one generation. Its fame and the fact that it started the entire culture of glitching in the Pokemon games makes MissingNo. the king of the reverse side of the Pokemon franchise - the side involving delving under the skin of the games and revealing hidden secrets. MissingNo. deserves an FA; the article is very maturely written and includes many very balanced and evened-out sections with enough pictures in the right places. It shows true, honest research and gives brilliant insight into the dark world of glitches and the strange unknown of Pokemon. From my point of view MissingNo. is Bulbapedia's magnum opus article, and should win the award to let the community know that the discovery of the MissingNo. species is an amazingly fascinating milestone event in the Pokemon franchise and will be remembered for years to come. [[User:Dusknoir477|Dusknoir477]] 12:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* I support it. This is the best article by far. (Pokemon1234567890) | * I support it. This is the best article by far. (Pokemon1234567890) | ||
* It only appeared in one generation, along with tons of other glitches. and yet this article is more detailed than most of the articles in Bulbapedia. [[User:223david|223david]] 07:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | * It only appeared in one generation, along with tons of other glitches. and yet this article is more detailed than most of the articles in Bulbapedia. [[User:223david|223david]] 07:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
*I support it. Awesome article. It's just like a real Pokémon Article. --[[User:Mclena45|Mclena45]] 02:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
====Object (0)==== | ====Object (0)==== | ||
Revision as of 02:49, 27 July 2009
Missingno.
Support (8)
- The best article on Glitch Pokémon this place has to offer. Detailed, organized, you name it. Missingno. Master says: The Celebi Glitch is real!(talk page) 11:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- This article is, in my honest opinion, certainly the most exquisite article on all of Bulbapedia. I am glad that MissingNo. nowadays is treated as a real Pokemon, even though it only appeared in one generation. Its fame and the fact that it started the entire culture of glitching in the Pokemon games makes MissingNo. the king of the reverse side of the Pokemon franchise - the side involving delving under the skin of the games and revealing hidden secrets. MissingNo. deserves an FA; the article is very maturely written and includes many very balanced and evened-out sections with enough pictures in the right places. It shows true, honest research and gives brilliant insight into the dark world of glitches and the strange unknown of Pokemon. From my point of view MissingNo. is Bulbapedia's magnum opus article, and should win the award to let the community know that the discovery of the MissingNo. species is an amazingly fascinating milestone event in the Pokemon franchise and will be remembered for years to come. Dusknoir477 12:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Holy crap, I could not have said it better myself. Missingno. Master says: The Celebi Glitch is real!(talk page) 13:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- This is one of the best articles on Bulbapedia. I could not know what Missingno. is, read this article, and know almost everything there is about Missingno., not to mention know great sites on it. Missingno. is truly a great article. Snowfire 10:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- A Featured Article is supposed to be the best of its type, setting an example, and the Missingno. page does just that; it puts an example for all other glitch Pokémon pages. The Dark Fiddler - You enter a poorly lit room... 17:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Has a great amount of research and is written well. I'm voting for it. UltimateSephiroth (about me · chat · edits) 15:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- I support it. This is the best article by far. (Pokemon1234567890)
- It only appeared in one generation, along with tons of other glitches. and yet this article is more detailed than most of the articles in Bulbapedia. 223david 07:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I support it. Awesome article. It's just like a real Pokémon Article. --Mclena45 02:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
