Talk:List of Pokémon by name
I noticed that this list is up-to-date as of Gen III, and very few of the Gen IV Pokémon have English names yet, so what do we do? Should we fill them in gradually as they get them, or wait for them all at once? Not including the Japanese romanji in there is a definite good idea, though, no matter what future generation we're dealing with. Tom Temprotran 04:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Vote for waiting the full list to avoid multiple edits and avoid rumors, besides there is always the chance of a last minute change like some G I PKMN had. Gambler 04:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, true. Ah well, now to have pages based on Pokémon by height and weight... Won't that be fun? Tom Temprotran 09:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Working on that right now. How about one by species? Or by Gender ratio? Or by Breeding Group? Or by EV given? Or am I going too far? Gambler 09:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- None of those is really too far, at least as much as I see. Species maybe, since those are maybe 3-4 Pokémon apiece... And we have the listed Egg groups (just not updated fully to Gen IV, I think)... EVs would be a good one, though... And maybe a gender page would be a good idea. Heck, it'd be a great one. I'll add those two to the template. Tom Temprotran 07:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Could someone have the regional numbers and browser numbers added to the table? i'd do it myself but its too tedious. 折り紙ガイ - 離す 貢献 16:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- None of those is really too far, at least as much as I see. Species maybe, since those are maybe 3-4 Pokémon apiece... And we have the listed Egg groups (just not updated fully to Gen IV, I think)... EVs would be a good one, though... And maybe a gender page would be a good idea. Heck, it'd be a great one. I'll add those two to the template. Tom Temprotran 07:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Working on that right now. How about one by species? Or by Gender ratio? Or by Breeding Group? Or by EV given? Or am I going too far? Gambler 09:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, true. Ah well, now to have pages based on Pokémon by height and weight... Won't that be fun? Tom Temprotran 09:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Umm, it says that no Japanese romanji will be included in the beginning, but the newly released Zoroark and Zorua are listed on the list
Little icons
I think this page would look better if it had the little icons before the Pokémon's name. I tried to add them myself, but it was too tedious. Especially since some of the pictures are .gif and some others are .png for no reason. -Someone Else
- Those that are beyond 400 are all png. Up to that point, they're all gif. And yes, it is tedious. TTEchidna
GSDS! 01:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I did A and B, by copy and pasting other tabled lists, but changing the data. And it is very tedious. Anyone can join in and help if they want. --Someone Else
- Okay! I have done the entirety of the page. It took a couple of days, but it's done. --Someone Else 08:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I did A and B, by copy and pasting other tabled lists, but changing the data. And it is very tedious. Anyone can join in and help if they want. --Someone Else
Ho-Oh and Honchkrow
In this article, Honchkrow precedes Ho-Oh. But the database's categories list Ho-Oh before Honchkrow. Personally, I'd change it to the way the categories do it. But I'm afraid I might mess up something. TorchicBlaziken 17:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- I thought special characters are supposed to come before the letters. Which would make sense to have Ho-Oh first. ~$aturn¥oshi THE VOICES 23:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Trivia
- Of the seven Pokémon that start with Z, two were introduced in Generation I (Zapdos and Zubat), two were introduced in Generation III (Zangoose and Zigzagoon), and three were introduced in Generation V (Zorua, Zoroark, and Zekrom).
-To me that doesn't seem trivia worthy, It is too broad, (Of the seven two are this, two are that, and three are the other) Lokitrick 13:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
