Talk:Shiny Pokémon/Featured article candidate
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
Support (4)
- I think this is a good article about game mechanics, plus who doesn't like Shiny guys? ----Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth (talk) 08:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. It looks as good as Oak's lab or Ilex Forest shrine. Maybe some expert could make random shiny sprite(s) appear on article.----無限の知性 ◎ ＤＥＮＮＯＵ◆ＺＥＮＳＨＩ 08:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- While I'm no expert, I made a sample on the talk page. --SnorlaxMonster 07:07, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Good job SnorlaxMonster! Hey, how often does it change? Even if this artcile isn't nominated, we could still put this on the page. Oh, do u support nominating this article? --Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth (talk) 08:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- It generates a random Pokémon by multiplying the total number of edits by the time in seconds (it also uses modulo to keep the number between 1 and 493). So it really changes every time you view the page, but you might have to hard refresh or purge the server's cache to see a change. --SnorlaxMonster 10:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Good job SnorlaxMonster! Hey, how often does it change? Even if this artcile isn't nominated, we could still put this on the page. Oh, do u support nominating this article? --Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth (talk) 08:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- While I'm no expert, I made a sample on the talk page. --SnorlaxMonster 07:07, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- I support this wholeheartedly, it's a great article. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talk • contribs) 14:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- I support this because I believe it quite well written and it is a great article on the subject. --User:Laikue 11:40, 08 December 2010 (CST)--
Object (3)
- Nah, it feels kind of...incomplete to me..like it could have more..Ataro 14:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- How so? I think it is quite interesting----Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth (talk) 06:39, 29 November 2010 (UTC).
- I feel like the sections on the side games are too short. While I know there isn't really much else to put there, it doesn't seem like good feature quality to have tiny subsections. The anime and TCG sections seem a little short, and there is no manga section; there must be Shiny Pokémon in at least one manga. --SnorlaxMonster 10:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- As far as I know of, the Red Gyarados is the only shiny guy in Adventures, and we could link to the Red Gyarados page for it. Besides, the magna is normally black and white, so it isn't much significance. ----Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth (talk) 02:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Crystal mentioned that she caught a differently colored Pokemon in one chapter..but that's just all we got from it...and even if it's in Black and White, it wouldn't hurt to put it there....Ataro 02:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know much about the magna, but if there is someone who does, could they write the section on it? That would be useful and improve the article, also it would be a good idea to link to the Red Gyarados article. ----Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth (talk) 03:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Crystal mentioned that she caught a differently colored Pokemon in one chapter..but that's just all we got from it...and even if it's in Black and White, it wouldn't hurt to put it there....Ataro 02:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- As far as I know of, the Red Gyarados is the only shiny guy in Adventures, and we could link to the Red Gyarados page for it. Besides, the magna is normally black and white, so it isn't much significance. ----Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth (talk) 02:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- While the article seems mostly complete, I don't feel it's feature quality. The page format is plain, and the sections, and by extension the article as a whole, are really short. Feature articles should be pages which go above and beyond most others, and I don't think this one is up to snuff. --AndyPKMN (talk) 12:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
