Template talk:Shipping redirect
Why don't we use {{PAGENAME}} where {{{1}}} is currently? We won't have to put {{shipping redirect|whatever}} but only {{shipping redirect}} in the article! The ZAPD0S_master 02:53, 26 March 2006 (CST)
Edit request
I think "click here" should lead to the shipping article. Can an admin add that? - unsigned comment from CuboneKing (talk • contribs)
Inconsistency
I've noticed that we have this on some Shipping articles, but not others. Should we do something about this? Flyingtypefan 03:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Find the ones that are missing it, and add it? It's a simple solution. Which 'ships have you seen without? Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 03:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
I was just asking because i wouldn't want to put all that work into adding it to those pages only to find out i shouldn't have done that and have it reverted, which would also create unneeded work for whoever had to revert all of them. I'll go add it now. Flyingtypefan 03:42, 24 July 2010 (UTC) Actually, i may be mistaken about some not having it. But i'll check anyway. Flyingtypefan 03:47, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Outdated design
This template looks currently very outdated, so wouldn't it be a good idea to change it to look like this:
| The article you are attempting to reach contains theories of a romantic relationship between {{{1}}} and {{{2}}}. If you are offended by such material, please turn away now.
To proceed to the article, click here: Shipping redirect |
Here's the new coding:
{| class="roundy" align="center" width="100%" style="background: #F6CCDA; border: 3px solid #F6A4D5"
|- align=center
|- style="background:#FFF0F5;"
|The article you are attempting to reach contains theories of a romantic relationship between {{{1}}} and {{{2}}}. If you are offended by such material, please turn away now.
To proceed to the article, click here: [[Shipping:{{{3|{{PAGENAME}}}}}|{{{3|{{PAGENAME}}}}}]]
|}<noinclude>[[Category:Notice templates]]</noinclude><includeonly>[[Category:Shipping redirects]]</includeonly>
--電禅Den Zen 15:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
how about this? it looks more interesting with a picture.
|
The article you are attempting to reach contains theories of a romantic relationship between {{{1}}} and {{{2}}}. If you are offended by such material, please turn away now. |
