Talk:List of Pokémon by Egg Group

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 20:44, 6 December 2016 by QwertyJacob750 (talk | contribs) (Merge)

Latest comment: 6 December 2016 by Nutter Butter in topic Merge
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽

I'm mulling over how to do the 2-egg-group Pokémon without having duplicates of the same Pokémon. Ideas? Sidnoea 19:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

There could combinations like Water 2/Monster or Plant/Ground or dragon/ground. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 00:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Egg Group Names?

Where did these Egg Group Names come from, anyways? The Official Guide Books have them named differently. I think we should include both names, even though these are more common, or something. R S E FR LG 02:37, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I would like to add Generation V to this...

I notice, however, that it's a terribly scrambled (why, for instance, does it need to be separated into groups like this?) page; even the template used for it is a hack. Do any higher-ups have suggestions for newer formatting or should I just add the new Pokémon using the current format? —hexagonTHEORY 06:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

I also think the setup is terrible. I think another LOP template is in order here; there would not be types, rather two spaces for the egg group, and it would all be in one sortable table. --SnorlaxMonster 06:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I thoroughly like the way you think, sir. Are you permitted to create said template? —hexagonTHEORY 06:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Group coloration...

How do you feel about that? If nothing else, I think it'd at least make the table look a little nicer. —hexagonTHEORY 09:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want. Colors already exist here. --SnorlaxMonster 13:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Delete

This info is on the Egg cycles page. I could see wanting to make that page a little prettier, but that's not really a difficult hurdle to overcome. So I'm thinking this page should be deleted.

I don't know if the link in Template:pokelist would be changed to point to Egg cycles or just removed... I kind of think it's nice for that to be "(by) Egg Group" to be prominent, so maybe the link should just get changed. Tiddlywinks (talk) 00:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Delete the page but...

I like the List of Pokemon by Egg Groups page because you can sort by egg group. I am not able to do that from the Egg Cycles page. However, the Egg Cycles page has more information. I think that they should just be combined, honestly, and then the List of Pokemon by Egg Groups should be deleted. Nove (talk) 06:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merge

The merge seems like a good thing to do, since the 2 pages are very similar. 475 QwertyJacob750 (talk) 20:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Agree. The Egg Cycles list is already a sortable table that lists the Egg Groups, so this page is completely unnecessary. Nutter Butter (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

P.S. how do I put those side things on my talk page?