Talk:Marriland

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 20:05, 3 April 2008 by Chibipika (talk | contribs) (NO to deletion: new section)

Latest comment: 22 March 2008 by Politoed666
⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptonavigation⧽⧼bulbapediamonobook-jumptosearch⧽
This page is slated for removal from Bulbapedia.

This article either clearly goes against the standard set forth by the manual of style or has gone through a deletion discussion on its talk page.

Administrators - Remember to check if anything links here and the page history before deleting.

This page was last edited on April 3, 2008 at 8:05 PM.

ADVERTISEMENTS ARE BAD! NO TO THIS PAGE493C 491 Is426for Cookie473 01:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't really think it's an advertisement. It's just a crappily-made article with no redeeming qualities. --ニョロトノ666 01:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Don't forget, as well as deleting the main article, we need to delete the talk page also! MoldyOrange 02:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
dont we have Serebii.com as an artcle? MAGNEDETH 02:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I like this article. Not the quality of course (what's with having a Pokemon infobox), but Marriland is a well established site, and this is not advertising. There's other articles on useful sites, such as Serebii. I just cleaned it up. I vote it stays. Porygon-Z 02:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
if this site allows other sites to be included, then i think it should be here. but if its an advertizing issue or, whatever, then, it would make sence to delete. but we have Serebii, so, thats why i brought it up. MAGNEDETH 02:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. This isn't like that article someone made earlier about their own site. Porygon-Z 02:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, so we aren't going to delete it, Aww! MoldyOrange 02:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
And oh yeah, every Pokemon page links to Marriland's dex. Porygon-Z 03:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Marriland is not a website. He's a person, and not a very notable one at that. Deletion. --ニョロトノ666 23:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

NO to deletion

I think we need to raise "awareness" of some pretty good websites like this. Plus, who cares if it's crappy, somebody will eventually clean it up and make it look better.