Talk:Dragonair (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (reply) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Gender Trades == | == Gender Trades == | ||
"In Blackthorn City, a woman is willing to trade her Rhydon for a female Dragonair. This makes Dragonair the only Pokémon to be required to be a certain gender for an in-game trade." This isn't really true, considering in the Generation I games, you could be asked for a Nidoran female or male, depending on the game. Should we add that in or remove this trivia? [[User:CherryParanoia|CherryParanoia]] 00:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC) | "In Blackthorn City, a woman is willing to trade her Rhydon for a female Dragonair. This makes Dragonair the only Pokémon to be required to be a certain gender for an in-game trade." This isn't really true, considering in the Generation I games, you could be asked for a Nidoran female or male, depending on the game. Should we add that in or remove this trivia? [[User:CherryParanoia|CherryParanoia]] 00:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 7: | ||
:::::But it still makes the trivia inaccurate. "required to be a certain gender for an in-game trade." Nidorans are required to be certain genders for in-game trades. Maybe not in the same way as Dragonair, but it still makes the Trivia inaccurate. [[User:CherryParanoia|CherryParanoia]] 16:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | :::::But it still makes the trivia inaccurate. "required to be a certain gender for an in-game trade." Nidorans are required to be certain genders for in-game trades. Maybe not in the same way as Dragonair, but it still makes the Trivia inaccurate. [[User:CherryParanoia|CherryParanoia]] 16:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::::And of course I suppose you'd also include the Chansey-Aerodactyl trade in G2? --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 17:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | ::::::And of course I suppose you'd also include the Chansey-Aerodactyl trade in G2? --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 17:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
"In Blackthorn City, a woman is willing to trade her Rhydon (G/S) or Dodrio (C/HG/SS) for a female Dragonair. '''This makes Dragonair the only Pokémon that is able to be more than one gender that is required to be a specific gender to be traded'''." | |||
::Now this statement makes absolutely no sense. Could someone fix it, please? I don't know what it's trying to say, otherwise I would. [[User:Eversist|Eversist]] 01:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:New comments go to the bottom of the page. I'll have a go rewording the offending sentence. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 22:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Name Origin== | ==Name Origin== | ||
Can I remove the part that says 'It may also be a play on debonair'. It seems really unecessary as there would be no reason for it to be a play on debonair.--[[User:Gallevoir|[[User:Gallevoir]]]] 20:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | Can I remove the part that says 'It may also be a play on debonair'. It seems really unecessary as there would be no reason for it to be a play on debonair.--[[User:Gallevoir|[[User:Gallevoir]]]] 20:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I would argue that such a graceful and mysterious Pokémon has EVERY reason to be a play on debonair. See [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/debonair]. --[[User:AndyPKMN|AndyPKMN]] 22:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | :I would argue that such a graceful and mysterious Pokémon has EVERY reason to be a play on debonair. See [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/debonair]. --[[User:AndyPKMN|AndyPKMN]] 22:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:15, 26 April 2010
Gender Trades
"In Blackthorn City, a woman is willing to trade her Rhydon for a female Dragonair. This makes Dragonair the only Pokémon to be required to be a certain gender for an in-game trade." This isn't really true, considering in the Generation I games, you could be asked for a Nidoran female or male, depending on the game. Should we add that in or remove this trivia? CherryParanoia 00:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- The Nido families are two separate evolutionary lines. --エルレイド 00:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- I know that. Doesn't stop them from having to be a certain gender for a trade. CherryParanoia 20:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- But only because they're single-gender! --エルレイド 23:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- But it still makes the trivia inaccurate. "required to be a certain gender for an in-game trade." Nidorans are required to be certain genders for in-game trades. Maybe not in the same way as Dragonair, but it still makes the Trivia inaccurate. CherryParanoia 16:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- But only because they're single-gender! --エルレイド 23:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- I know that. Doesn't stop them from having to be a certain gender for a trade. CherryParanoia 20:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- The Nido families are two separate evolutionary lines. --エルレイド 00:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
"In Blackthorn City, a woman is willing to trade her Rhydon (G/S) or Dodrio (C/HG/SS) for a female Dragonair. This makes Dragonair the only Pokémon that is able to be more than one gender that is required to be a specific gender to be traded."
- Now this statement makes absolutely no sense. Could someone fix it, please? I don't know what it's trying to say, otherwise I would. Eversist 01:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- New comments go to the bottom of the page. I'll have a go rewording the offending sentence. —darklordtrom 22:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Name Origin
Can I remove the part that says 'It may also be a play on debonair'. It seems really unecessary as there would be no reason for it to be a play on debonair.--[[User:Gallevoir]] 20:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
