Talk:Wild held items

Shouldn't this also include percentages? Just wondering... ^ht14 03:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

yes i am trying to figure how to do it... im not the best...--Wowy 03:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Unavailable Pokémon

A lot of the Pokémon in this list are those which are not obtainable in the wild by legitimate means. I suppose the Pokémon can be obtained by cheating, but would they hold the certain held items as well? Or should those Pokémon be removed from the list altogether? Kevin Y (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Remaining items with ?? are not on the pokemons' profile page

All the remaining items with no percentage are not listed as held items on the concerned pokémons' profiles. I don't have the last gen games so I can't verify myself. --Stoo 04:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WHY DELETE???

I mean, come on, this page is OK, needs a bit more info i admit, but a full blown delete? I think if no-one says anything for deleting in 10 mins, i'll delete the delete tag. SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 18:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Ten minutes is really and honestly way too short of a time for you to wait for responses.

I'm sure the tag was put there for a reason. I think they're making a new page for this info to go on instead or something, but I'm not sure. 梅子^❄_❅ 18:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

List of Pokémon by wild held item. If you'd checked the page history you'd have seen that the Grand High Echidna added it. Do we question his actions? No, not really. —darklordtrom 10:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

No offence, but that page sucks. SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 19:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Because it is not yet complete. If you'd like to help fill it out, I'm sure you'd be more than welcome. 梅子^❄_❅ 19:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I'll be blatantly honest, this page is MUCH more readable than the newer page. A giant table is nice and informative, but if someone wants to quickly see what holds what, they're going to look by generation, not by Pokemon. Really, we need both pages: this one for quick reference, and the other for more in-depth... "study", I guess you could say. --Teradyne 20:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

It got deleted...

...and not restored, so why is it still here? CuboneKing 23:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Because the server hates you :P —darklordtrom 01:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)