User talk:PAK Man: Difference between revisions
m (→Jessie: Reply and thank you) |
(→Acceptable Username?: new section) |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
::Thank you [[User:Truthseeker4449|Truth]][[User talk:Truthseeker4449|seeker]][[Special:Contributions/Truthseeker4449|4449]] 23:17, 19 September 2011 (UTC) | ::Thank you [[User:Truthseeker4449|Truth]][[User talk:Truthseeker4449|seeker]][[Special:Contributions/Truthseeker4449|4449]] 23:17, 19 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Acceptable Username? == | |||
I was look though the user log looking for unwelcomed users, and I found this {{u|Hellhammer|one}}. I know this wiki does not like bad langange, but I am looking for a second opinion on wether to get them blocked or slap them with a welcome. [[User:Truthseeker4449|Truth]][[User talk:Truthseeker4449|seeker]][[Special:Contributions/Truthseeker4449|4449]] 01:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:03, 7 October 2011
For past talk page discussions, see User talk:PAK Man/Archive
If you want to leave me a new message, please click on the + sign next to the Edit This Page button.
Additionally, when somebody posts on my talk page requesting something and I do not respond, please reply on that individual's talk page and not on mine. It greatly reduces the clutter, and enables me not to get involved in somebody else's problems. Thank you.
protect
Since you seem to be online, could you protect Complete Burn and Complete Burn (move) from being created? According to Serebii, it was seen on a McDonald's flier as a move for Victini. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 02:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Keeping you in the loop
About a year and a half ago, the Image: namespace was turned into the File: namespace in a MediaWiki upgrade. The old version still works, but if you see an old Image:xyz.abc when editing it is preferable to turn it into File:xyz.abc. Good to have you back, although I was barely here when you left. —darklordtrom 04:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Ah!?
What are you doing!? Aren't there not supposed to be disambig templates on the pages that don't have a disambig page!? --Landfish7 23:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- 1. No need to be rude and 2. see the Pokémon pages lacking disambiguation notices category. Thank you. --PAK Man Talk 23:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- 1. I uncaps locked it. 2. That doesn't mean we have to give them disambiguation notices! Its just a category, where is it stated that even Pokémon pages without disambigs get the notice? --Landfish7 23:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- That category means that all of those pages should have the new templates in them, which is what I was doing. Also, it's never a good idea to undo an edit an administrator made, so please watch your edits next time. --PAK Man Talk 23:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, but all of those pages are gonna have red links there causing them to be a wanted page, when they may never have a disambig page since old Pokémon aren't going to appear too often anymore because of Unova only having Gen V Pokémon in the anime, except for Meowth and Pikachu and Umbreon which all have disambigs anyway. --Landfish7 00:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- There's confusion over whether Pokémon without disambiguations should get the template. I thought that it needed to be removed because of this. After which Jello removed the templates. Pikiwyn talk 00:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Guys, cool it. We're discussing this right now. Hold off on your comments for a bit. —♥ Jellotalk 00:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- There's confusion over whether Pokémon without disambiguations should get the template. I thought that it needed to be removed because of this. After which Jello removed the templates. Pikiwyn talk 00:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, but all of those pages are gonna have red links there causing them to be a wanted page, when they may never have a disambig page since old Pokémon aren't going to appear too often anymore because of Unova only having Gen V Pokémon in the anime, except for Meowth and Pikachu and Umbreon which all have disambigs anyway. --Landfish7 00:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- That category means that all of those pages should have the new templates in them, which is what I was doing. Also, it's never a good idea to undo an edit an administrator made, so please watch your edits next time. --PAK Man Talk 23:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- 1. I uncaps locked it. 2. That doesn't mean we have to give them disambiguation notices! Its just a category, where is it stated that even Pokémon pages without disambigs get the notice? --Landfish7 23:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey PAK,
Mind logging onto AIM at the moment? --☆CoolPikachu! 00:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Jessie
Taking note of the recent edit warning on the arcticle, would it make sense to protect the page? Truthseeker4449 23:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Acceptable Username?
I was look though the user log looking for unwelcomed users, and I found this one. I know this wiki does not like bad langange, but I am looking for a second opinion on wether to get them blocked or slap them with a welcome. Truthseeker4449 01:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC)