Talk:Vanilluxe (Pokémon)

Move to Vaivanila?

I know it's a little bit obvious but maybe we should use this name like we did with Reparudasu/Leopardas. --Shining Latios 02:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Isn't Leopardas the official romanization? Ataro 03:06, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

*facepalm* Thanks for the confirmation but I wonder now why we have Meloetta and Genesect when their names (and existence) have not been revealed to public.--Shining Latios 03:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

the same way we knew Tsutarja's official romanization name before it was put on products, the official japanese site took the names and registered them Ataro 03:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

And why would it be Vaivanila? That's just as awkward. Wouldn't it look better as Vivanilla? --ケンジのガール 06:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I guess because it's the way the Kana goes? Ba-i-ba-ni-ra > Va-i-va-ni-la?

It is obviously Bivanilla.--でんのう ☢ Zえんし 10:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Or Babanana? *awkward crummy joke silence*--444Zekrom 10:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

It could possibly be Baivanilla, where 倍bai is a Japanese word for 'double', for example in 倍速baisoku, 'double-speed'. Either way they're all guesses I guess. Bluesun 08:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Egg Moves

There are a number of egg moves for Baibanira which say they need to be chain-bred from another Pokémon from its evolution family. Is this because nothing else from the Mineral egg group can have these moves? And would this even count as chain-breeding in that case? It's quite confusing. --Andy^P_K^M_N 17:54, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

I don´t know if it is considered chain breeding, but i think the moves it has to breed from itself are from the dream world.--Jespoke 21:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

To be honest, saying they're from chain breeding is misleading. They are not. Not exactly. They require you to breed Baibanira with a Pokemon that learned the move from a Generation IV game, like Glalie. RiverShock 15:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Trivia

Is it worth noting that it has a smiley-face-like pattern on its back? →ΑΧΧΟΝΝ_fire 23:59, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

It's already mentioned in the article near the beginning. --Pokemaster97 00:01, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Right. →ΑΧΧΟΝΝ_fire 00:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Is it worth noting that it's the only 3-stage pure ice type pokemon? - unsigned comment from Myzou (talk • contribs)

No. --SnorlaxMonster 11:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Why not? Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

"Three-stage" "pure" "Ice-type". The trivia is overly specific. --SnorlaxMonster 12:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)