Talk:Pokémon of Myth orbs: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Title) |
m (→Title) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Does anyone else think the current title, '''timespace orbs''', sounds a bit silly? The word order generally used is "spacetime", but as that also excludes Giratina, I suggest we simply go for a parallel construction with the term "[[creation trio]]" and move this to "'''creation orbs'''". Does anyone agree? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 17:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC) | Does anyone else think the current title, '''timespace orbs''', sounds a bit silly? The word order generally used is "spacetime", but as that also excludes Giratina, I suggest we simply go for a parallel construction with the term "[[creation trio]]" and move this to "'''creation orbs'''". Does anyone agree? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 17:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Well, the term "timespace" comes from the Darkrai movie, I think, so it does have a more canonical basis than "spacetime" in this case. However, I do agree that "creation orbs" would match "creation trio" better, especially since that is what this site calls the trio by (although personally I prefer "spacetime/timespace trio" for technical reasons, but that's neither here nor there). [[User:Ensephylon|Ensephylon]] ([[User talk:Ensephylon|talk]]) 20:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC) | :Well, the term "timespace" comes from the Darkrai movie, I think, so it does have a more canonical basis than "spacetime" in this case. However, I do agree that "creation orbs" would match "creation trio" better, especially since that is what this site calls the trio by (although personally I prefer "spacetime/timespace trio" for technical reasons, but that's neither here nor there). [[User:Ensephylon|Ensephylon]] ([[User talk:Ensephylon|talk]]) 20:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
::For the record, I have not seen the Darkrai movie and was thus unaware that the term was (semi-?)canonical. How was the term used, specifically? Was it the exact phrase "timespace trio", which should indicate | ::For the record, I have not seen the Darkrai movie and was thus unaware that the term was (semi-?)canonical. How was the term used, specifically? Was it the exact phrase "timespace trio" or "timespace orbs", which should indicate those are the correct page names on canonical grounds? Or was it just a general "there's this thing called timespace and these Pokemon wield it" sort of thing? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 20:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:43, 28 July 2013
Title
Does anyone else think the current title, timespace orbs, sounds a bit silly? The word order generally used is "spacetime", but as that also excludes Giratina, I suggest we simply go for a parallel construction with the term "creation trio" and move this to "creation orbs". Does anyone agree? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 17:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- Well, the term "timespace" comes from the Darkrai movie, I think, so it does have a more canonical basis than "spacetime" in this case. However, I do agree that "creation orbs" would match "creation trio" better, especially since that is what this site calls the trio by (although personally I prefer "spacetime/timespace trio" for technical reasons, but that's neither here nor there). Ensephylon (talk) 20:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- For the record, I have not seen the Darkrai movie and was thus unaware that the term was (semi-?)canonical. How was the term used, specifically? Was it the exact phrase "timespace trio" or "timespace orbs", which should indicate those are the correct page names on canonical grounds? Or was it just a general "there's this thing called timespace and these Pokemon wield it" sort of thing? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 20:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
