Talk:Contest condition: Difference between revisions
Totodilette (talk | contribs) |
m (Maverick Nate moved page Talk:Contest category to Talk:Contest condition) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 21:15, 13 September 2013
Name
Yeah, I think it's "condition".
Yeah. Pretty sure on that one.
Maybe we ought move all five of the Contest types to X Condition or X (condition). Just sayin'. TTEchidna 08:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- We could probably even move them to just X. Cool and Cute share their names with Musical categories, but those just redirect to their current pages anyway, with redirect notes (not to mention how minor Musical categories are). --SnorlaxMonster 08:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Seems I somehow missed Beauty. I guess "Beauty (condition)" would be a good idea. --SnorlaxMonster 09:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- I think just "Condition" would work. In the games they just mention "condition", but if you think people will be confused with the weather conditions, so "Contest condition" will be better. --Mikuri 23:37, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Seems I somehow missed Beauty. I guess "Beauty (condition)" would be a good idea. --SnorlaxMonster 09:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Error?
According to the Smart Contest article, it's easy raise the Smart condition in Pokémon with natures that boost Special Depfense (Calm, Gentle, Sassy, and Careful), however, this article says that is hard raise Smart condition in Calm Pokémon. --Mikuri 14:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Missing some table lines?
The table "Contest categories" is missing a separator line between "Flavor" and "Color". Was this done on purpose or it's just me? The table for "Nature" is also missing a line between "Hardy" and "Lonely". If it is needed to be fixed, please help because I can't understand to make tables yet. ^^; Thank you. Oh and I agree on changing it to "contest condition"; the Pokéblock section uses "condition". --Totodilette (talk) 03:25, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't see the issue you mention, and there is no difference in the code that would make one divider appear and another not. --SnorlaxMonster 03:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think it's already fixed just now. Thanks again. :) --Totodilette (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2013 (UTC)