Talk:Kalos Route 6: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 6: Line 6:
:Checked my Prima guide and confirmed it does list it as average. -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] ([[User talk:Tyler53841|talk]]) 17:23, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
:Checked my Prima guide and confirmed it does list it as average. -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] ([[User talk:Tyler53841|talk]]) 17:23, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
::Also note that 20 is not a large enough sample size to accurately detect rarity. Try more like 1000+; that should be enough to approach being vaguely accurate. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 18:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
::Also note that 20 is not a large enough sample size to accurately detect rarity. Try more like 1000+; that should be enough to approach being vaguely accurate. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 18:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
:::20 is only the number of the Pokemon in question; I'm sure I encountered at least 100 Pokemon, give or take 20. [[User:Liberty Bell|Liberty Bell]] ([[User talk:Liberty Bell|talk]]) 02:36, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:36, 3 November 2013

So I've encountered the two tourists, the Family, and Youngster Tyler, but on the right-side path, I fought Backpacker Jerome at the top, Tourist Mai (a young variant of the older Tourist, still female), and Youngster Jacob, and I didn't encounter Roderick or Brigitte, but I could have missed them? Those were on the left-hand path? Or is there a version difference? Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 09:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Encounter Rates

From experience, I doubt that Espurr are found at an "Average" rate. From about 15 minutes of shuffling around in the grass, I found 8 Honedge and only 12 Espurr, contrary to what "Average" led me to believe. Liberty Bell (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Checked my Prima guide and confirmed it does list it as average. -Tyler53841 (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Also note that 20 is not a large enough sample size to accurately detect rarity. Try more like 1000+; that should be enough to approach being vaguely accurate. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
20 is only the number of the Pokemon in question; I'm sure I encountered at least 100 Pokemon, give or take 20. Liberty Bell (talk) 02:36, 3 November 2013 (UTC)