Talk:Extraterrestrial Pokémon

Rumored?

I think there was one episode that showed clefairy in a meteor/rocket, and didn't lunatone and solrock come from a meteor? S and T 16:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Lunatone and Solrock's Pokedex entries state that they are rumoured to come from a space, so while it is obvious that they are offworld, they should be kept in the rumoured section for now. As for Clefairy, they should probably be in the confirmed section, due to that spaceship and launch station they built. XVuvuzela2010X 16:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

About clefairy, I meant the episode Clefairy and the Moon Stone. S and T 16:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Jirachi

Jirachi has strong ties with comets, and I think it might have been said to be from outer space. Should it be included? S and T 16:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

This page is still young, so there are a number of Pokemon like Jirachi that need to be added, namely Arceus, Giratina, Unown, Palkia, Dialga. XVuvuzela2010X 16:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Yuxie, Mesprit, and Azelf may need a mention too. And Registeel's Dex entries imply it is offworld, which by extension could include the other three Regi's. XVuvuzela2010X 16:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't think we should include Palkia, Dialga, Giratina, or Unown. They're from a different dimension, not outer space. Chiramii *** Talk 16:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Well this page is for Extraterrestrial Pokemon, so there is no reason not to include them. XVuvuzela2010X 16:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Uxie, Mesprit, Azelf

...have a section with no data at all. We should add some data; I would, but I didn't put in the section and I'm still not clear on why it's there. EvilKirikizan 03:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Update! I just realized Jirachi has the same situation. Just felt like that should be noted too. EvilKirikizan 03:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Kyurem Evidence

Should Kyurem really be in the Known section? I mean, it's only in legend that it came from outer space like Clefairy, there's no actual info confirming that Kyurem actually came from outer space, is there? Bolter1 01:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Sableye?

I think Sableye might deserve a mention in this article. He's based off of an alien, although they don't mention his origins in any of the games or anime. I don't think it would be that much of a stretch to say he's extraterrestrial. However, there's no evidence besides his origin so I'm not really sure if or how this could be added. I thought it deserved a mention anyways. Flintlock (talk) 19:58, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Sigilyph?

Sigilyph is an enigma on the planet where all the games take place, right? Well, Sigilyph might be extraterrestial! Few people know its origin*, and while Elgyem, Beheeyem, and Kyurem can't learn Cosmic Power, Sigilyph can. For now, just put it in Weak Evidence, OK? KirbyRider (talk) 08:17, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Nothing states that they came from space or another planet though. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 08:26, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Sigilyph learns Cosmic Power, and it looks very little like Earth life. KirbyRider (talk) 22:46, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

About half of the 649 Pokémon would fit your "very little like earth life" description. Sigilyph doesn't have any evidence in game or in the naime that says it is an extra terrestrial being. Cosmic Power does not necessarily mean it is an extraterrestrial being, especially if Elgyem (who is an extra terrestrial being) can't learn it, throwing that case out of the window.--ForceFire 02:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Type or typing?

I can't decide whatever we can revert it or not even saying "type" makes sense, so please know whatever we can keep the word "typing" whatsoever. --Cinday123 (Talk) 08:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

I don't really understand, but...

"Psychic-type" was wrong, period. "Type" should be the noun with "Psychic" describing it. But that's easily fixed. However, to say "It shares its Psychic type with other[s]" sounds weird...Celebi doesn't share its Psychic type. It shares with others the Psychic type that it was assigned. IMO, "Psychic typing" has less potential for confusion. ...And that's beside the fact that I simply don't consider "typing" to be "wrong", so I do not consider that part of the original edit necessary in the first place. Tiddlywinks (talk) 08:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)