Talk:PKMN.NET: Difference between revisions
m (moved Talk:PUK to Talk:PKMN.NET: according to the article, that is not the name any more) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Didn't PUK stand for Pokemon UK (no relation with the other Pokemon UK)? [[User:Joe9320|Joe9320]] 07:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | Didn't PUK stand for Pokemon UK (no relation with the other Pokemon UK)? [[User:Joe9320|Joe9320]] 07:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
== PKMN.NET HACK 6/9/2016 == | |||
The website is currently down due to a hack that occurred today. Hopefully this can be fixed soon. The source of the hack is a HackForums user called ComplexSkills. [[User:British Soldier|British Soldier]] ([[User talk:British Soldier|talk]]) 02:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:36, 10 June 2016
I'm new to this wiki thing - but this page was quite out of date. I've removed myself from the admin list and made a few minor changes. Also, may I request this page be called PKMN.NET rather than PUK, they haven't offically used that name for nearly six years. - unsigned comment from GoldenMisdreavus (talk • contribs)
I agree with that. Only about 30% of the visitors are from UK, with about 15% from Neatherlands and 33% from the US (At least that's what Joeno said).Flappy 16:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Isn't PUK short for something?
Didn't PUK stand for Pokemon UK (no relation with the other Pokemon UK)? Joe9320 07:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
PKMN.NET HACK 6/9/2016
The website is currently down due to a hack that occurred today. Hopefully this can be fixed soon. The source of the hack is a HackForums user called ComplexSkills. British Soldier (talk) 02:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)