Talk:Accuracy: Difference between revisions
(→Unclear: new section) |
Nescientist (talk | contribs) (→Move: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
This doesn't really seem that clear to me, if a number over 1 always hits, does that mean that it generates a random number from 0 to 1 and if the random number is over the result of the formula then it misses?{{tt|*|I'm guessing that since it can miss one turn and miss the next, but I wanted to be sure before putting it in the article.}} -[[User:IVsaur|<span style="color:lightbrown">EVs</span><small><span style="color:black">and</span></small><span style="color:green">IVsaurs</span>]] 19:59, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | This doesn't really seem that clear to me, if a number over 1 always hits, does that mean that it generates a random number from 0 to 1 and if the random number is over the result of the formula then it misses?{{tt|*|I'm guessing that since it can miss one turn and miss the next, but I wanted to be sure before putting it in the article.}} -[[User:IVsaur|<span style="color:lightbrown">EVs</span><small><span style="color:black">and</span></small><span style="color:green">IVsaurs</span>]] 19:59, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Move == | |||
My line of reasoning is as follows: People looking for "accuracy" are more than likely to actually be looking for {{stat|accuracy}} (and may not even know all the details beforehand). So, "Accuracy" should really be a disambiguation, linking to both topics. That means this article needs to be moved, and the most adequate choice is to move it to "Move accuracy", cause it's move related. That's similar to how we have [[category]] being the disambiguation linking to [[damage category]] (or, so I hope, to [[move category]] soon). [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 14:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:38, 11 August 2016
This article
Why exactly is it exist? There is section in the article about stats. Maybe we should move all the info (um, actually only Gen I mechanics) there? --ЫъГЬ 19:20, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Statuses
If I paralyze the Pokemon, does that increase accuracy, or do status effects not apply in the accuracy part? --Vinnievu (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Glitch?
I just encountered (Pokemon Emerald) a case where a 100% accuracy move, Ice Beam, missed on the first turn of a battle (and thus no modifiers yet). Should I add this glitch onto this page or the glitches page? - unsigned comment from Jjl2357 (talk • contribs) 8:01pm 6 March 2013
- It is unlikely to be a glitch. Chances are it was affected by an Ability. Can you provide further information about the situation? --SnorlaxMonster 04:23, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Unclear
This doesn't really seem that clear to me, if a number over 1 always hits, does that mean that it generates a random number from 0 to 1 and if the random number is over the result of the formula then it misses?* -EVsandIVsaurs 19:59, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Move
My line of reasoning is as follows: People looking for "accuracy" are more than likely to actually be looking for accuracy (and may not even know all the details beforehand). So, "Accuracy" should really be a disambiguation, linking to both topics. That means this article needs to be moved, and the most adequate choice is to move it to "Move accuracy", cause it's move related. That's similar to how we have category being the disambiguation linking to damage category (or, so I hope, to move category soon). Nescientist (talk) 14:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
