Bulbapedia talk:Project Arcade: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
RotaRaichu (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Tretta Class Hyphenation == | == Tretta Class Hyphenation == | ||
I've been hyphenating Tretta classes if I see them if it's used as an adjective, similar to the MoS guideline on type, e.g. XXXX is a Normal-class Tretta. Is there any policy on this, or should they be hyphenated the same way as type? [[User:RotaRaichu|RotaRaichu]] ([[User talk:RotaRaichu|talk]]) 04:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | I've been hyphenating Tretta classes if I see them if it's used as an adjective, similar to the MoS guideline on type, e.g. XXXX is a Normal-class Tretta. Is there any policy on this, or should they be hyphenated the same way as type? [[User:RotaRaichu|RotaRaichu]] ([[User talk:RotaRaichu|talk]]) 04:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
==Beginning 17 Type Set== | |||
Shouldn't this set be added? [[User:Blob55|Blob55]] ([[User talk:Blob55|talk]]) 21:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:17, 5 October 2018
Yeah, see what to-do list? --☆ヨッシ ー の世界☆ 00:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Battrio & Tretta pages
Should there be TCG like pages for Battrio and Tretta? Currently, its only a 'category' page, but maybe we could make it like a TCG page, with descriptions, sets, rarity, etc.
Tretta Class Hyphenation
I've been hyphenating Tretta classes if I see them if it's used as an adjective, similar to the MoS guideline on type, e.g. XXXX is a Normal-class Tretta. Is there any policy on this, or should they be hyphenated the same way as type? RotaRaichu (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Beginning 17 Type Set
Shouldn't this set be added? Blob55 (talk) 21:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
