Talk:Pokémon of Myth orbs: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Title) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Keep in mind, the Darkrai movie was made before Giratina was expressly involved in the trio. I'm in favor of "Creation Orbs." [[User:Porygon-man|Porygon-man]] ([[User talk:Porygon-man|talk]]) 01:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | :::Keep in mind, the Darkrai movie was made before Giratina was expressly involved in the trio. I'm in favor of "Creation Orbs." [[User:Porygon-man|Porygon-man]] ([[User talk:Porygon-man|talk]]) 01:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::Perhaps Continuum Orbs would be a good name? You know like how when you royally screw up the fabric of the universe through time travel, you mess with the Time-Space Continuum? Cosmic would also be a good name for them since the beings that hold them are universal cosmic entities. [[User:Yamitora1|Yamitora1]] ([[User talk:Yamitora1|talk]]) 03:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | ::::Perhaps Continuum Orbs would be a good name? You know like how when you royally screw up the fabric of the universe through time travel, you mess with the Time-Space Continuum? Cosmic would also be a good name for them since the beings that hold them are universal cosmic entities. [[User:Yamitora1|Yamitora1]] ([[User talk:Yamitora1|talk]]) 03:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::Yes, this article should have been "spacetime", but I got the morphemes the wrong way around. But as has been pointed out, this doesn't really include the Griseous Orb all that well. Instead, I propose we make the title properly conjectural rather than trying to invent a name ourselves, and move the page to '''Creation trio orbs'''. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 08:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
== XY Description changes? == | == XY Description changes? == | ||
Revision as of 08:29, 16 June 2019
Title
Does anyone else think the current title, timespace orbs, sounds a bit silly? The word order generally used is "spacetime", but as that also excludes Giratina, I suggest we simply go for a parallel construction with the term "creation trio" and move this to "creation orbs". Does anyone agree? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 17:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- Well, the term "timespace" comes from the Darkrai movie, I think, so it does have a more canonical basis than "spacetime" in this case. However, I do agree that "creation orbs" would match "creation trio" better, especially since that is what this site calls the trio by (although personally I prefer "spacetime/timespace trio" for technical reasons, but that's neither here nor there). Ensephylon (talk) 20:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- For the record, I have not seen the Darkrai movie and was thus unaware that the term was (semi-?)canonical. How was the term used, specifically? Was it the exact phrase "timespace trio" or "timespace orbs", which should indicate those are the correct page names on canonical grounds? Or was it just a general "there's this thing called timespace and these Pokemon wield it" sort of thing? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 20:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep in mind, the Darkrai movie was made before Giratina was expressly involved in the trio. I'm in favor of "Creation Orbs." Porygon-man (talk) 01:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps Continuum Orbs would be a good name? You know like how when you royally screw up the fabric of the universe through time travel, you mess with the Time-Space Continuum? Cosmic would also be a good name for them since the beings that hold them are universal cosmic entities. Yamitora1 (talk) 03:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, this article should have been "spacetime", but I got the morphemes the wrong way around. But as has been pointed out, this doesn't really include the Griseous Orb all that well. Instead, I propose we make the title properly conjectural rather than trying to invent a name ourselves, and move the page to Creation trio orbs. --SnorlaxMonster 08:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps Continuum Orbs would be a good name? You know like how when you royally screw up the fabric of the universe through time travel, you mess with the Time-Space Continuum? Cosmic would also be a good name for them since the beings that hold them are universal cosmic entities. Yamitora1 (talk) 03:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep in mind, the Darkrai movie was made before Giratina was expressly involved in the trio. I'm in favor of "Creation Orbs." Porygon-man (talk) 01:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- For the record, I have not seen the Darkrai movie and was thus unaware that the term was (semi-?)canonical. How was the term used, specifically? Was it the exact phrase "timespace trio" or "timespace orbs", which should indicate those are the correct page names on canonical grounds? Or was it just a general "there's this thing called timespace and these Pokemon wield it" sort of thing? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 20:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
XY Description changes?
I was just looking at the description for the orbs, and it names the Pokémon that holds them. However, I am fairly certain when I originally obtained the items, they did not list the Pokémon by name. Could someone who has yet to obtain the dragons verify this? Yamitora1 (talk) 03:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
