Talk:Oddish (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Removing rotating art notice) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Mandrake? == | |||
Guys...is oddish a mandrake or what?[[User:LedianX|LedianX]] 20:59, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) | Guys...is oddish a mandrake or what?[[User:LedianX|LedianX]] 20:59, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
No. [[User:Sheep|Sheep]] 21:05, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
It cries when taken out of the ground, but since the cry doesn't do anything, I'd say no.--BJG | |||
Who knows.. | |||
== Taxonomy == | |||
Eh hem... Kabutops has a Scientific name, Kabutops Maximis. (Said in Fossil Fools.) ----[[User:Zewis29|<span style="color:diamond">Zewis</span>]] [[User talk:Zewis29|<span style="color:green">(2</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Zewis29|<span style="color:blue">9)</span>]] 18:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
May I add this? ----[[User:Zewis29|<span style="color:diamond">Zewis</span>]] [[User talk:Zewis29|<span style="color:green">(2</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Zewis29|<span style="color:blue">9)</span>]] 18:22, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Guys? Why is Oddish's moves-by-breeding in gen II different from Vileplume's? == | |||
Seriously, this is kind of weird: Vileplume's egg moves in gen II page says that swords dance must be bred from a pokemon that learned it in a previous gen, (that is, using the gen I TM), and accordingly does not list any 2nd gen pokemon on the paternity list; however, oddish's egg moves in gen II page simply lists swords dance as "must be chain bred", and gives the chikorita, sunkern and hoppip lines as possible fathers; however, of these, only the chikorita line has any access at all to swords dance, and that via breeding from a 1st gen pokemon that used the TM. | |||
Is this some sort of oversight? | |||
[[User:Harumei|Harumei]] ([[User talk:Harumei|talk]]) 16:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Oddish's page was obviously wrong, so I fixed it.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 16:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:06, 15 October 2019
Mandrake?
Guys...is oddish a mandrake or what?LedianX 20:59, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
No. Sheep 21:05, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
It cries when taken out of the ground, but since the cry doesn't do anything, I'd say no.--BJG
Who knows..
Taxonomy
Eh hem... Kabutops has a Scientific name, Kabutops Maximis. (Said in Fossil Fools.) ----Zewis (29) 18:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
May I add this? ----Zewis (29) 18:22, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Guys? Why is Oddish's moves-by-breeding in gen II different from Vileplume's?
Seriously, this is kind of weird: Vileplume's egg moves in gen II page says that swords dance must be bred from a pokemon that learned it in a previous gen, (that is, using the gen I TM), and accordingly does not list any 2nd gen pokemon on the paternity list; however, oddish's egg moves in gen II page simply lists swords dance as "must be chain bred", and gives the chikorita, sunkern and hoppip lines as possible fathers; however, of these, only the chikorita line has any access at all to swords dance, and that via breeding from a 1st gen pokemon that used the TM. Is this some sort of oversight? Harumei (talk) 16:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
