Talk:Dracozolt (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (So that is why) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) (?) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I don't want to start an edit war, but I'm confused as to why we removed the bit about Bolt Beak when it's been listed on the signature move page for a little bit. No one has had a problem with it there. In my opinion, Dracozolt and Arctzolt are similar enough to warrant it being considered a signature move. [[User:AmoongussForLife|AmoongussForLife]] ([[User talk:AmoongussForLife|talk]]) 15:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC) | I don't want to start an edit war, but I'm confused as to why we removed the bit about Bolt Beak when it's been listed on the signature move page for a little bit. No one has had a problem with it there. In my opinion, Dracozolt and Arctzolt are similar enough to warrant it being considered a signature move. [[User:AmoongussForLife|AmoongussForLife]] ([[User talk:AmoongussForLife|talk]]) 15:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
:They're counterparts, but they are not of the same evolutionary line, which is one of the things needed for the move to be a signature move. They were placed in the wrong place on the sginature move page, they should've be in the "Moves commonly associated with certain Pokémon" section, not the main template. | :They're counterparts, but they are not of the same evolutionary line, which is one of the things needed for the move to be a signature move. They were placed in the wrong place on the sginature move page, they should've be in the "Moves commonly associated with certain Pokémon" section, not the main template.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#00A1E9">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#59C2F1">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#BF004F">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D5598C">ire</span>]] 05:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
::So basically whoever add those moves in the signature move page just mis-match where they were supposed be. Well that is awkward.--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob Kogan]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 05:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | ::So basically whoever add those moves in the signature move page just mis-match where they were supposed be. Well that is awkward.--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob Kogan]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 05:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:37, 20 December 2019
Origin
About the origin, the upper half is not based on a velociraptor. The description of the Fossilized Bird item states it is a flying creature. It is a bird. The same applies to Arctozolt. Herbizarre (talk) 05:38, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Signature Move
I don't want to start an edit war, but I'm confused as to why we removed the bit about Bolt Beak when it's been listed on the signature move page for a little bit. No one has had a problem with it there. In my opinion, Dracozolt and Arctzolt are similar enough to warrant it being considered a signature move. AmoongussForLife (talk) 15:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- They're counterparts, but they are not of the same evolutionary line, which is one of the things needed for the move to be a signature move. They were placed in the wrong place on the sginature move page, they should've be in the "Moves commonly associated with certain Pokémon" section, not the main template.--ForceFire 05:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- So basically whoever add those moves in the signature move page just mis-match where they were supposed be. Well that is awkward.--Jacob Kogan (talk) 05:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
