Talk:-- (move)

Merge?

I think we should, instead of separate articles, have one list of glitch moves and their effects. TTEchidna^G_SDS! 00:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I vehemently disagree. Glitch moves are every bit as notable as the Glitch Pokémon that learn them. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talk • contribs) 23:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Name?

Okay, the type is CoolTrainer♀, but the name of this move is very obviously --. TTEchidna 23:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Move (not the Pokémon kind)

I suggest we move this to something like "-- (glitch move)". In party templates, if a Pokémon has three or less moves, then the placeholder for the leftover cells links to "-- (move)", which is currently an article on this glitch move. It's obviously not likely that readers will click on the "--" in the party templates and become confused on why the Pokémon has a glitch move, but it is still possible. ~ overgrown^sol 01:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, either that or use parser functions on the templates themselves so that it doesn't link here if there aren't four moves. ~ overgrown^sol 01:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

The whole last section should be revised

The whole effect in the last paragraph of the article is common when using this move. It is often called the "TMTRAINER effect" as it causes the game to change the opposing Pokémon's name to "[glitch text]TMTRAINER DITTO [glitch text]" when it tries to attack. Should I create an article and revise section? OwnageMuch 05:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, it's not generally always a [Ditto], so DITTO, within that text piece, would be replaced with the player's Pokémon that was in battle before the TMTRAINER Effect was triggered. scooterscanley (talk) 16:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--'s relation with Super Glitch

Is -- supposed to be Super Glitch?

Harming the game if used in a cave?

How exactly does it harm the game? What effects does it cause (crash, corruption, etc)? Mario60866 (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)