Talk:Sacred Ash: Difference between revisions
ArtistKyurem (talk | contribs) (→Insufficient description of its effects: new section) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Technically, the player could steal the Sacred Ash from Ho-Oh, then lose to it, flee from it (Gen III), or (Gen IV onward) defeat it. If the player then re-enters the room (in Gen II and III) or enters the Hall of Fame (from Gen IV onward), they could then battle Ho-Oh again and steal its item again. However, for most players, this would not really be helpful to classify as a repeatable method even though it technically is. Should we count it as one? (Note that I haven't actually tried this, so it's possible that if you steal Ho-Oh's item it doesn't get it back, but I doubt it.) --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 03:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC) | Technically, the player could steal the Sacred Ash from Ho-Oh, then lose to it, flee from it (Gen III), or (Gen IV onward) defeat it. If the player then re-enters the room (in Gen II and III) or enters the Hall of Fame (from Gen IV onward), they could then battle Ho-Oh again and steal its item again. However, for most players, this would not really be helpful to classify as a repeatable method even though it technically is. Should we count it as one? (Note that I haven't actually tried this, so it's possible that if you steal Ho-Oh's item it doesn't get it back, but I doubt it.) --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 03:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
== Insufficient description of its effects == | |||
At least in Gen III, Sacred Ash also fully restores the HP of non-fainted Pokemon if it is successfully used, not just the fainted Pokemon like the current description of its effect implies. If anyone's willing to check if this is true across the generations...? [[User:ArtistKyurem|ArtistKyurem]] ([[User talk:ArtistKyurem|talk]]) 00:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:10, 17 October 2022
Since this item is now available on Dream Radar....
Should I put that its obtainable in generation V thanks to that app? Because Im afraid that people might delete it off if I put it there. Antlionerd (talk) 22:05, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- I’d be happy about such information. Other pages also mentions items which you get from the Pokéwalker, GameCube games etc. so I think it should be fine. And why should this information be withheld, if people look at the page to find out where to get the item? Peterpansexuell (talk) 23:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Sacred Ash from ORAS
I received a Ho-oh from the GTS, and it appears to be holding sacred ash. It's possible for it to be available in ORAS. --HoennLove200 (talk) 16:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Not necessarily- someone could have hacked to get it. Nintendo's hack checks are spotty enough that I wouldn't be surprised if they'd let an unobtainable item go through the GTS. You might get the item normally by encountering Ho-oh, but I have AS so I can't check. Yamiidenryuu (talk) 23:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- I believe Ho-Oh can be caught with it in OR. --HoennLove200 (talk) 01:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Repeatability of wild held items
Technically, the player could steal the Sacred Ash from Ho-Oh, then lose to it, flee from it (Gen III), or (Gen IV onward) defeat it. If the player then re-enters the room (in Gen II and III) or enters the Hall of Fame (from Gen IV onward), they could then battle Ho-Oh again and steal its item again. However, for most players, this would not really be helpful to classify as a repeatable method even though it technically is. Should we count it as one? (Note that I haven't actually tried this, so it's possible that if you steal Ho-Oh's item it doesn't get it back, but I doubt it.) --SnorlaxMonster 03:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Insufficient description of its effects
At least in Gen III, Sacred Ash also fully restores the HP of non-fainted Pokemon if it is successfully used, not just the fainted Pokemon like the current description of its effect implies. If anyone's willing to check if this is true across the generations...? ArtistKyurem (talk) 00:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
